2009.07.07_TC_Minutes_SpecialTOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH
MINUTES OF TOWN COMMISSION MEETING
SPECIAL MEETING
Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:00 A.M.
Mayor Jim Newill, CPA called the Workshop Meeting to order in Commission Chambers at 9:00
A.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
Roll Call: Members present: Mayor Jim Newill, CPA; Vice Mayor Miriam S. Zwick;
Commissioner Doris M. Trinley; Commissioner John J. Sorrelli; and Commissioner John J.
Pagliaro. Also present: Town Attorney Tom Sliney; Town Manager Dale S. Sugerman; Town
Clerk Beverly M. Brown; Deputy Finance Director Cale Curtis; and Assistant to the Town
Manager Zoie Burgess.
Pledge of Allegiance: The Pledge of Allegiance was given, followed by a minute of silence in
honor of members of the military, both living and deceased.
Civility Pledge: The Civility Pledge was recited by the Town Clerk.
1. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS OR ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA
Agenda accepted as submitted.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND REQUESTS
No comments received.
3. NEW BUSINESS
A) Setting the Tentative Maximum Millage Rate — Fiscal Year 2009-2010
Town Manager Sugerman stated that the purpose of today's meeting is to have the Town
Commission set the "Tentative Maximum Millage Rate" for fiscal year 2009-2010 which
begins on October 1st of this year and runs through September 20th of next year.
A verbatim record of the Town Manager's comments is attached to and is being made part of
this meeting.
Town Commission Special Minutes
July 14, 2009 Page 2 of 2
The Town Commission did not have any questions on the Town Manager's presentation.
Town Manager Su eg rman publicly thanked Deputy Finance Director Cale Curtis for all his
assistance and work on the budget.
Commissioner Trinley thanked both Town Manager Sugerman and Deputy Finance Director
Curtis on the in-depth detail of the budget and presentation.
MOTION: Vice Mayor Zwick moved to set a Tentative Millage Rate of 3.7898 mills for the
2009 - 2010 Fiscal Budget Year; seconded by Commissioner Pa lg iaro.
ROLL CALL:
Vice Mayor Zwick -
Yes
Commissioner Pagliaro -
Yes
Commissioner Sorrelli -
Yes
Commissioner Trinley -
Yes
Mayor Newill -
Yes
Motion passes with a 5-0 vote.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND REQUESTS RELATED TO ITEMS DISCUSSED AT
MEETING
None
5. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Commission, Mayor Newill adjourned
the Workshop Meeting at 9:35 A.M. upon a MOTION by Commissioner Pa lg_iaro; seconded
1.
by Vice Mayor Zwick.
APPROVE:
B erly M. Br n, C
Date
Jim N Will, CPA, Mayor
Mira S. Zwick, ,ayor
Doris M. Trinley, Commission
J4KT1-J:-sWe1J , Commissi
John J/,Yagliaro, 96mmissi
The purpose of today's meeting is to have the Town Commission set the
Tentative Maximum Millage Rate for fiscal year 2009-2010 which begins on October 1 st
of this year, and runs through September 30t" of next year. As today is just July 14t"
and since we are only setting the tentative, maximum millage rate, what this allows us to
do is, as we go about the budget process over the next three months, we will use the
tentative maximum millage rate set today to establish the upper end of the amount of ad
valorem taxes we propose to collect next fiscal year. Between today and the end of
September, the Commission can always lower next budget year's tax rate, but after
today, the tax rate can never be increased through the balance of the budget -setting
process. After today, the tax rate could go down, but it cannot go up. The result of
today's meeting and tax rate decision is that we will advertise to the public what the
highest possible tax rate the Commission might set for next fiscal year. That way, the
public knows the most that we would ever charge in taxes next year. And again,
between now and the start of the fiscal year, the tax rate could always be finalized at a
lower rate than what we advertise. But it cannot go any higher than what we initially
advertise after today's meeting.
I would like to start this presentation on page 2 of the budget booklet. Please look
at the number at the top of the last column on the right hand side of page 2. It shows
that the proposed budget includes $7,936,744 in "current ad valorem taxes" for 2009-
2010. This number is the amount of taxes this proposed budget will collect from our
citizens next year. You will see in a few minutes how that number ties back to the
11_� millage rate. Now, please look at the column to the immediate left. That shows the
Page 1 of 11
amount of ad valorem taxes that we had anticipated we would collect this current
budget year. That number is $7,919,801. The difference between these two numbers is N.."
just $16,943. The proposed budget for 2009-2010, as presented herein, if adopted as
presented, will collect $16,943 more next year in ad valorem tax revenues than we were
anticipating collecting at this same time last year.
Now please look at the bottom of the first section of the right hand column again.
That number is $10,458,890. This is the total amount of General Fund revenues that we
anticipate collecting this next budget year. It includes not only the proposed ad valorem
tax revenues for the year, but also all of the other revenues such as franchise fees,
licenses, permits, fines, interest earnings, etc.
I would ask you to now turn to page 3 of the budget book and look at the bottom
of the first section of the right hand column again. This is the total amount of General
Fund expenditures that we anticipate we will incur during this next budget year. It
includes the spending for all of the operating departments, including the Town
Commission, the Town Manager, the Town Clerk, the Finance Department, etc. Please
notice that the bottom line of our expenditures ($10,458,890) at the bottom of this first
section on page 3 is exactly equal to the bottom line of our revenues of $10,458,890 at
the bottom of the first section on page 2. One might ask how can we predict that our
revenues will exactly equal our expenditures in the General Fund next budget year?
The answer is that we really haven't made that prediction. Actually, with this proposed
budget, we are actually anticipating that our revenues will slightly exceed our
expenditures next year. That can be found in the line right above the bottom line of
expenditures on page 3. Notice that immediately above the total expenditure amount of
Page 2 of 11
$10,458,890 you will see a Reserve for Contingency line item and the amount found in
that Reserve for Contingency line item is $363,882. This proposed budget, with all of its
anticipated revenues and all of its anticipated expenditures results in $363,882
remaining available and appropriated, but unassigned for any particular expense during
the upcoming budget year. This amount is what one might call the flexibility factor in the
General Fund budget as of this moment in the budget adoption process. Throughout the
budget process, we will probably spend a considerable amount of time talking about this
number, and how it might go up or might go down, depending on what the Town
Commission wants to do with setting the ad valorem tax rate, adding additional
expenditures to the budget, or eliminating recommended expenses already contained in
the recommended budget. Are there any questions at this point?
r� Let's now get into the details of setting the tentative maximum millage rate.
Please turn your budget books to page 4. 1 am also passing out a single sheet of page 4
so that it might be easier for you to work with this page. You will notice that there are a
lot of lines and columns on this page. The columns are identified across the top of the
page as A -F and the rows are identified as 1-16 down the side of the page. This is a
very intricate chart, so I will always try to identify for you where I am on the page when I
am talking about a particular number.
Please look at line 2 of this chart. This shows you the assessed value of all of the
property in Highland Beach. Last year (Column A) our assessed value in 2007-2008
was $2.254 billion dollars. This year (Column B), our assessed value in 2008-2009 was
$2.142 billion dollars. For the next fiscal year (Columns C -F which include all of the
possible tax options for next year) the Property Appraiser's Office has told us that our
Page 3 of 11
assessed value is $1.935 billion dollars. One can clearly see that over the last 3 years,
the Town's assessed value will have decreased from $2.254 billion dollars to $1.935
billion dollars, a decrease of 15.3%.
Now, please look back at Column B. This column gives you a picture of this
budget year, Column A is last budget year, and columns C -F are various options for
next budget year. Now, please look at Column B, line 7. That is this year's tax rate.
Notice that it is 3.85 mills. And look at Column A, line 7. That shows us that last year's
millage rate was 3.95 mills. Commissioners will remember that for this budget year we
lowered the millage rate from 3.95 mills to 3.85 mills and I know that our citizens
appreciated that decision. But I need to take you deeper into the millage rate so that you
have a good grasp of what will be happening going forward into the new budget year.
Please go back to Column B, line 7 which is the current millage rate of 3.85 mills. That
3.85 mills is made up of a number of component parts. It includes a general operating
millage rate, along with voter approved debt service. The voter approved debt service
includes activities such as the construction of the water treatment plant and the Town's
Library. Here is how that 3.85 mills is made up. Still looking at Column B, please notice
line 4. The number 3.4042 is our base general operating millage. To that amount we
have to add all of the voter approved debt service. That can be found in lines 5a, 5b,
and 5c. 5a is the component part of the millage rate to support the voter approved water
plant construction loan, 5b is the component part of the millage rate to support the voter
approved library construction loan, and 5c is the component part of the millage rate to
support the voter approved repayment of the first $8 million dollar SRF revolving fund
loan for the water plant. Those three voter approved debt service amounts total 0.4458
Page 4 of 11
mills which can be found on line 6 of Column B. So when you add lines 4 (general
operating rate millage) and line 6 (historical debt service millage) together, you get line
7, the total current year tax rate of 3.85 mills. Let me stop briefly for any questions.
Now let's move over to Column C. Column C is built around an assumption that
we would not change the general operating millage rate for the next budget year. But
look at line 2 of Column C. In this column, we are already starting at a lower point that
the current budget year (Column B), because our assessed valuation has gone done
significantly year -over -year. But remember, in this particular scenario, I am making no
change in the general operating millage rate, which is line 4 of Column C. Notice that in
line 4 of Column C the general operating millage rate is still 3.4042, the exact same
number as this year's general operating millage rate which can be also be found in Line
4 over in Column B. Those numbers are the same- representing "no change" year -over -
year in the general operating millage rate. However, the overall millage rate does
change year -over -year, because the debt service millage rate has to go up when the
assessed value goes down as it will next budget year. This can be found in lines 5a, 5b,
and 5c of Column C when compared to 5a, 5b, and 5c of Column B. Even with "no
change" the overall total current tax rate would go up to 3.8924 mills (Column C, line 7)
because the assessed value has gone down year -over -year. Let me stop again to see if
there are any questions.
Let's now look at the millage rate formula that I am recommending for the
upcoming budget year. That can be found in Column D. Column D is built on an
assumption that we will lower the general operating millage rate by .05 mills. With an
operating tax rate lowered by an additional .05 mills, this would demonstrate to our
Page 5 of 11
citizens that we continue to work hard to lower their taxes. It is a small decrease in
taxes, but a decrease nonetheless. Please look at Column D, line 4. It shows a general
operating millage of 3.3542 mills, which is .05 mills less than the current year (Column
B) and the "no change" (Column C) general operating mills of 3.4042. But please
remember, to that amount, we would have to also add in the historical debt service
millage (lines 5a, 5b and 5c of Column D) with a resultant total millage rate of 3.8424
mills (which is Column D, line 7).
Now, please look all the way at the bottom of Column D on line 16. This
represents the total ad valorem tax revenues that a .05 millage decrease would
generate for the budget year if the Town Commission settles on my recommended
budget numbers. That number is $7,936,744. Now, please turn back to page 2 of your
budget booklet and look at the top line of the right hand column. That number is also
$7,936,744. These two numbers match. A.05 millage rate reduction in general
operating taxes will generate $7,936,744 in revenues for the General Fund next budget
year. That is how this budget has been built. But I would like to show you some
additional alternatives. But before I do, are there any questions?
Before we look at the alternatives, I also need to show the Town Commission the
impact that the most recently added voter approved debt service has on the overall
millage rate.
In November of 2008, our voters approved two new ad valorem debt service
projects, including using taxes to pay for the second $8 million dollars costs for the
original construction and the final Phase II improvements to the water treatment plant,
Page 6 of 11
and also approved using taxes for the SR AM water transmission line project. Let me
show you where those voter -approved debt service numbers show up in the millage rate
calculations. Without going into a significant amount of detail, lines 8a, 8b, 8c, and 8d
across Columns C -F depict the 2008 referendum, voter approved, ad valorem taxes.
Together, each of these millage rates associated with those projects are collectively
depicted on line 9 of Columns C -F. Notice, that none of these numbers appears in
Columns A or B (the current or prior years). That is because this debt did not exist in
those years. This new debt only begins with the next budget year and has been
depicted in all of the alternatives going forward (Columns C -F). The new voter approved
ad valorem tax millage will add .04301 mills to whatever base millage rate and historical
debt service millage rate the Town Commission sets going forward. Adding the new
voter approved ad valorem tax millage rate (Column D, line 9) to the total current tax
millage rate (Column D, line 7) of the .05 millage rate reduction scenario, we get a final
millage rate of 4.2725 mills (Column D, line 10), which again, raises the $7,938,744 for
the General Fund which is found on line 16.
So, looking at things from a big perspective, if you look at both the top of the
chart, and the bottom of the chart, you will see that Column C (the "no change" column;
meaning no tax reduction) would raise $8,029,626 in General Fund taxes (line 16). The
.05 millage rate decrease (Column D) would raise $7,936,744 in taxes (and this is the
scenario the recommended budget has been built around). Column E is an alternative
.10 mills decrease and it would raise $7,843,863 in taxes (which would be a further
decrease of $92,881 in tax revenues to the General Fund; which if the Commission
followed this scenario would force a reduction in the proposed Reserve for Contingency
Page 7 of 11
amount). Column F is an alternative which is an increase of .05 mills over the current ad
valorem tax rate. It would raise $8,122,508 in General Fund Taxes (line 16). This would
be an increase of $185,764 in tax revenues to the General Fund; which if the
Commission followed this scenario would create an increase in the proposed Reserve
for Contingency amount. Are there any questions?
So, it is now time to set the Tentative, Maximum Millage tax rate. However,
want to share one more thought with you, and one more chart with you. My
recommended budget is based upon the scenario outlined in Column D, the .05 mills
decrease over last year's millage rate. I have also shown you what a .10 mills decrease
would do and what a .05 mills increase would do. But, we have a few other scenarios
we can look at.
By law, whatever we do today has to be published and our citizens will get a
formal notice of the direction that our Highland Beach taxes will be headed (at least on a
preliminary basis). This is what should peak voter's curiosity and bring them out to our
budget hearings, so that they can make their own recommendations to you on how we
should be spending their money and how much we should be taxing them. When we
publish the ad on what you approve today as the Tentative Maximum Millage Rate, we
will either have to publish a Notice that the Highland Beach taxes are proposed to
increase or that they are proposed to decrease. However, the determination of whether
they are increasing or decreasing is also based upon the fact that the assessed values
have dropped significantly this past year. Therefore, believe it or not, we could actually
have a higher millage rate that results in a publication that our taxes are actually
decreasing. Let me show you how that works:
Page 8 of 11
I am passing out another chart. It is identical to the chart on page 4 of the budget
book; however, we have added two more columns and two more lines. Column H is a
depiction of what is called the "Roll Back" rate. This is the rate that, by law, allows us to
increase the millage rate, collect more in tax revenues, and not do so at a net loss in tax
revenues to the Town because our assessed valuations have gone down year -over -
year. Looking at Column H, we could set a base tax millage rate of 3.7898 (line 4),
advertise a 0% increase in taxes (line 18) and raise $8,745,930 in ad valorem tax
revenues (line16). This would be an increase of $809,186 in General Fund revenues
over my proposed budget number (Column D, line 16), which if the Commission set this
as the tentative maximum millage rate would thereafter show up in the Reserve for
Contingency line in the budget, giving the General Fund a total of $1,173,068 in
appropriated, but unassigned funds for expenditure. That compares to the current
recommended number of $206,900 from page 2 of the budget document.
And from this chart, the Commission can see the impact of each of these
scenarios. Please look at lines 17 and 18 in each of the columns:
In Column D, the decrease of .05 mills would be a reduction of 1.47% in
revenues year over year and a reduction of 11.49% in revenues from what is allowed
under the roll back rule.
In Column E, the decrease of .10 mills would be a reduction of 2.94% in
revenues year over year and a reduction of 12.81 % in revenues from what is allowed
under the roll back rule.
Page 9 of 11
In Column F, an increase of .05 mills would be an increase of 1.47% in revenues
year over year, but still a reduction of 8.86% in revenues from what is allowed under the
roll back rule.
Column G depicts a 0% total tax increase (because this accounts for the full
decrease in assessed valuation) and it would be an increase of 10.74% in revenues
year over year, but would still be a 0.53% reduction in revenues from what is allowed
under the roll back rule.
And Column H is the roll back column. It would allow for an increase of 11.33% in
revenues year over year, and would allow us to advertise that the proposed tax rate in
Highland Beach would be neither a tax increase nor a tax decrease. If this scenario is
selected, our tax rate would be equal to the roll back rate which results in a 0.0% impact
on tax revenues.
In closing, what we are doing today is only setting the Tentative Maximum
Millage Tax Rate. Whatever you set today is the amount that will go on what is called
the TRIM notice that is mailed out to our residents. That will be the announcement that
tells them our starting point on the millage rate, tells them when our budget hearings will
be, and might possibly trigger some discussion within the community. In the end,
however, this is not what is going to be the Final Tax rate. The Final Tax rate will be set
in September during the actual budget hearings and the final adoption of the budget.
Once you set the tentative maximum millage tax rate today, that tax rate can never go
higher. It can always go lower once we get to the budget hearings; but after today it
cannot go higher.
Page 10 of 11
Finally, I want to specifically thank Cale Curtis, our Deputy Finance Director who
has worked very closely with me in doing all of these calculations. Cale has prepared all
of these charts and he has spent considerable time working with me to bring all of this
together for today's presentation. I consider Cale a subject matter expert on this
process and quite frankly, I could not have done it without him. And between the two of
us, we would be happy to answer any final questions that you might have before we ask
you to set the Tentative Maximum Millage Tax Rate.
Page 11 of 11
n
u
•
•
r
1.)
2.)
3.)
4.)
5.)
a.
b
C.
6.)
7.)
8.)
a.
b,
C.
d.
9.)
10.)
11.)
12.)
13.)
14.)
15.)
16.)
TOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH
PRELIMINARY MILLAGE CALCULATION
FY08/09 - FY 09/10
A B C D E F
NO
DECREASE .05
DECREASE .10
INCREASE .05
PRIOR
YEARS
CHANGE
MILLS
MILLS
MILLS
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2009-2010
2009-2010
2009-2010
TAXABLE VALUE- DR420
2,254,116,427
2,142,803,286
1,935,036,153
1,935,036,153
1,935,036,153
1,935,036,153
FINAL GROSS TAXABLE VALUE
2,238,941,501
2,140,106,933
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MILLAGE GEN. OPERATING
3.5217
3.4042
3.4042
3.3542
3.3042
3.4542
MILLAGE DEBT SERVICE -HISTORICAL
SUNTRUST RO LOAN
0.0664
0.0698
0.0773
0.0773
0.0773
0.0773
BO FA LIBRARY LOAN
0.1420
0.1447
0.1547
0.1547
0.1547
0.1547
STATE LOAN -HISTORICAL
0.2199
0.2313
0.2662
0.2662
0.2562
0.2562
0.4882
0.4882
0.4882
0.4882
SUB -TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0.4283 0.4458
TOTAL CURRENT TAX RATE
3.9500
3.8500
3.8924
3.8424
3.7924
3.9424
MILLAGE DEBT SERVICE -NEW
Ref. 2008 STATE LOAN -REMAINING
-
-
0.1414
0.1414
01414
0.1414
Ref. 2008 2007 BOFA PROM NOTE
0.1598
0.1598
01598
0.1598
Ref. 2008 AIA GENERAL FUND LOAN
0.0209
0.0209
0.0209
0.0209
Ref. 2008 AIA WATER MAIN SRF LOAN
-
0.1080
0-1080
0.1080
0.1080
0.4301
0.4301
0.4301
0.4301
SUB -TOTAL DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL TAX RATE WITH NEW VOTER
APPROVED DEBT SERVICE
3.9500
3.8500
4.3225
4.2725
4.2225
4.3725
TAXES LEVIED OPERATING
7,938,322
7,294,531
6,587,250
6,490,498
6,393,746
6,684„002
TAXES LEVIED DEBT SERVICE
965,438
955,262
1,776,944
1,776,944
1,776,944
1,776,944
TOTAL TAXES
8,903,760
8,249,793
8,364,194
8,267,442
8,170,690
8,460,946
x96%
x96%
x96%
x96%
x96%
x96
6,323,760
6,230,878
6,137,997
6,416,642
TAXES LEVIED OPERATING @96% 7,620,789 7,002,750
TAXES LEVIED DEBT SERVICE @ 96%
926,821
917,051
1,705,866
1,705,866
1,705,866
1,705,866
AD VALOREM TAXES-FINALIDR-420
8,547,609
7,919,801
8,029,626
7,936,744
7,843,863
8,122,508
TOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH
ALLOCATION OF DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS
STATE -LOAN
FISCAL YEAR
1MILLION STATE LOAN GF SUBSIDY
LINE OF CREDIT INTEREST ONLY FOR AIA PROJ
1,000,000 3.M LOAN 580k
INTERIM
LOAN
RO PLANT
4.299 MILL
2007 PROM
NOTE
'STATE LOAN STATE LOAN
RO PLANT RO PLAN
FIRST 7,000,000 REMAIN 3.8 MIL
TOTAL
LOANS
WATER
LIBBRARY
BUILDING
LOAN
TOTAL
DIVIDED BY .96 EPD GROSS UP
0.96
TAX BILLINGS NEEDED
$1,776,634
G.O. DEBT TAXES
$1,935,036,153
2010 CALCULATED MILLAGE ($/$1,000)
0.91814
2000-01
0
$1,776,634
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2001.02
42,000
DUE 2010
0
0
0
0
42,000
0
42,000
2002-03
160,700
0.15469
STATE LOAN- HISTORICAL
0
0
0
0
160,700
0
160,700
2003.04
151,643
0.13569
0.14135 11/08 Ref.
40,000
0
255,572
0
447,215
15,500
462,715
2004-05
143,600
10,000
0
475,854
0
629,454
40,000
669,454
2005.06
143,581
38,783
0.02004
0
0
475,854
0
619,435
115,300
734,735
2006-07
143,581
0
0
475,854
0
619,435
312,714
932,149
2007.08
143,581
0
0
475,854
0
619,435
304,215
923,650
2008.09
143,581
0
0
475,854
0
619,435
297,710
917,145
2009.10
143,581
200,565
11/08 Ref.
38,783
11/08 Ref.
0
296,864
11/08 Ref.
475,854
262.570
11/08 Ref.
1,416,217
267,352 1,705,569
REVOLVING LOAN BASE ADMENDMENT k 3 -PRINCIPAL AMOUNT $7,506,000 PAYMENT $255,129 SEMIANNAUL
MILLAGE CACULATION:
DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS
$1,705,569
DIVIDED BY .96 EPD GROSS UP
0.96
TAX BILLINGS NEEDED
$1,776,634
CURRENT TAX VALUE
$1,935,036,153
2010 CALCULATED MILLAGE ($/$1,000)
0.91814
BILLABLE
TOTAL
$1,776,634
MILLAGE
RATE 9
DEBT PAYMENTS
96%
DUE 2010
($/$1,000)
SUNTRUST RO LOAN
$143.581
0.07420
0.07729
BOFA LIBRARY LOAN
287,352
0.14850
0.15469
STATE LOAN- HISTORICAL
475,854
0.24591
0.25616
SUB -TOTAL
$906,787
0.46862
0.48814
STATE LOAN- NEW 2010
$262,570
0.13569
0.14135 11/08 Ref.
2007 PROM NOTE BOFA
296,864
0.15342
0.15981 11/08 Ref.
SUB -TOTAL
$1,466,221
0.75772
0.78929
Al CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
Al A CONSTRUCTION STATE LOAN
200,565
0.10365
0.10797 11108 Ref.
AIA CONSTRUCTION GF SUBSIDY
38,783
0.02004
0.02088 11/08 Ref.
TOTAL
$1,705,569
0.88141
0.91814
r
Z
= J
U D
W J
m
z U
¢ w
J Q
= J
U J_
S
LL
O ¢
3 Z
J
W
2
CL
m M n
N
O7
OD O O
O 7
0
7 (D
O
o 0
Ln
co
I
o co
a
cli o o
o
00
v
a
a
Cl)co
m
o m
a o
a
o
w o D
}
o 0 o
r> n
=
o n
n
N M Q
r
lA
r-
00
W
Z
U oo M
J
V7 N rn
O
2
LL
n Cl) n
N
N m
oco
O O
f0
0 0
xXxd N
W O � 0 In
00
r!
a b NC\j O
Cl)
co
I
V 0)
n a00.
t0t
co
W
} N
Q Cl) O O d
O
V
N�
n0 x
00
n
O O
V
Cl)
0 0 0 0
0
V
0
c Q
UCO
Q 00 L Z
n -
O)
r, .-
OD
0 2
m N rn
LL
v n v
w
v
N
Of
o
v 0
N g
o
N
m [`') LO NV O r
O m
O o
O
N
O O
-I m
x)
R c0
N
n O
7 b
O Cl) 0 0 l?
O
Obi
a
Cl)n
V CD
O
m )n
N
LU W
W
M
C] C G OJ
U
4
� n
V
��
cm
LL
¢ J
J N MO Q
cD .-
m
CD .-
OD
W
Q O z
U
(nN C7)
Z
o
LL
v r v
m
a
v
m
r
n m
.T-.
O
M Occ
N
O CV)
C\iN
m
COD x O
m m
co
Q O � Cl) O O
O
ch
O C 0
0
7
cn N
r-
W N
W
W
cn
¢ J
N C`) _Q
CO
m
O
�
_O
-j
z
O
Q0
w
m
co
W
U) N
�
LL
N co
-It
co
10
v
N ti
w
m CO
m
<
n
o O
Ln
m co M o t2
v
M
n
ono
C+7 0 0
W O
O
O C 0
0
v
'o
�
x
C`O') O
en
7
W
N J
.N-
} N m Q
cM
0
' n
m .-
CI
N
co
N t`
ID
O)
C
Q o[i z
U
U
N Gi
LU
0
-
LL
N M n
N
gg o
O
V o
°)
O O
`n°
CO
LU
Q o a o m
00
11
c id
�o,)
N
N
rn
m
C7
W
} O CD Cl) O O
O
m
O
V
M
n m
m n
7 x
CO
Cl) LO
N O
oD
N
U
N co Q
M
0 0 0 0
0
V
N n
M
M Ni
O
Q Q
2=
U 00 Z
m .-
CO
m .-
Z Z
'
U
CA N rn
LL
m m Cl) N 00 n Cl)
W M V M V
O
O
O
LqN Cl) O
¢
O
�
) n
N(nO
000
y O VOVN�
00
-It U) Q) xN n
Oi
m
J N c O Cl) O O O O
Cl)
M
N 0)) N O m
T
rn
Q o N o
r- 00 n
r;
a�cm
V
LU
LL N N
n 'NNa co
O CO
O
ON
Wm ^Wa m 00 N
O
Q
n
W O o
rn
o 0 0 o
m co `x Na0)
$
Q
J N Cl)
ri
Cl)
co rn m )n m
a
Vo v 00
n 00 N
w
N N N
LL N N
r
m
w
OLU
W
F
cr
Z uj
O
Y
w m
>
Z w 0>
a
} D
O J U.
w
Q
U Q Q co
Q Z Z fA y
W
Cn
N
O J
O O
W LL a m
m a
R
d¢
W O W
O¢
O
¢¢ O
0
w
O
® w
<
°¢
> Z_¢� a
~
zaawwaw
> >
p z W j m- H
Q
W O LL Z F- H
Z
Z¢ Z m
Z
LL LL
LLIN (� m J O
m
U W a O=
Q�
LL
W W
Q
W mz
Q In
rm Cc
QJ
LL
W X O w Z) 0 0
p
w H O¢¢ O
W W m
X
Q Q
m m Vi rn
z
u, cn N¢¢ m
F
O o O O
Gf
7 ~
U U
�~
¢
o w w w
> O (D 0
m
o
> > > >
¢
¢ ¢
W m
J W W
U
w 0 0 0 0
F W
J/
UJ
J
z z
Q Q
g N N N N
QX J
Z
F
F Q
JW( XJ �W( �
0
m m
H LL
m m m m
U)
Q Q O Q Q
F- ♦- F F r-
Q
a CL
r
r N Cl) Lf) !G h 00 0)r r r r