Loading...
2010.03.17_TC_Minutes_Special (2) Original Transcript THE TOWN OF COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH, FLORIDA TOWN COMMISSION MEETING March 17, 2010 10:30 a.m. 3614 South Ocean Boulevard Highland Beach, Florida 33487 Reported By: Beth Sklar, Professional Reporter Notary Public, State of Florida ( Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com a 1 THE TOWN OF COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH, FLORIDA TOWN COMMISSION MEETING Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:30 a.m. - 12:12 p.m. 3614 South Ocean Boulevard Highland Beach, Florida 33487 Reported By: Beth Sklar, Professional Reporter Notary Public, State of Florida Esquire Deposition Services West Palm Beach Office Job #152101 Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive an Alexander Gallo Com Boca Raton, FL 33431 °any www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 2 1 PRESENT: 2 MR. JIM NEWELL, Mayor 3 MS. MIRIAM S. ZWICK, Vice Mayor 4 MS. DORIS M. TRINLEY, Commissioner 5 MR. JOHN J. SORRELLI, Commissioner 6 MR. JOHN J. PAGLIARO, Commissioner 7 MR. DALE S. SUGERMAN, Town Manager 8 THOMAS E. SLINEY, ESQ., Town Attorney 9 THOMAS J. BAIRD, ESQ., Special Counsel 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 431 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 3 �. 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 - - - 3 MR. BAIRD: This is a private session and the 4 purpose of the private session is for the Town 5 Commission and legal counsel to discuss the 6 settlement negotiations and strategy related to the 7 litigation in the case of Palm Beach County versus 8 Town of Highland Beach, Case Number 502009CA02XMB 9 filed July 20, 2009, in the case of Palm Beach 10 County versus Town of Highland Beach, Case Number 11 502009CP018459XMB filed May 27, 1 09, 2009. The 12 entire session will be reported by a certified 13 court reporter. We expect -- I would expect the 14 session would last about an hour and a half. 15 The following persons will attend the 16 attorney- client private session: Town Commission 17 members Jim Newell, Mayor; Miriam S. Zwick, vice 18 mayor; Doris M. Trinley, Commissioner; John J. 19 Sorrelli, Commissioner; John J. Pagliaro, 20 Commissioner; Dale Sugerman, Town Manager; Thomas 21 E. Sliney; and Thomas J. Baird, attorney 22 representing the Town in these matters. 23 Once the attorney- client meeting is completed, 24 the Commission will return to open session, and I 25 think we're now ready to go into closed session. Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 4 1 MAYOR NEWELL: Thank you. I would now request 2 the public to vacate the chambers. 3 (The public exits the chamber.) 4 MR. SLINEY: I just want to remind everybody 5 that once the matter is terminated, the cases are 6 terminated, anything you say today would be a 7 public record, so I just wanted to mention that, 8 and ready for the Mayor to begin the meeting. 9 MAYOR NEWELL: Okay. One thing: I don't know 10 what the rest of you are going to do with this 11 letter, but I refuse to look at a last minute 12 letter, maybe sometime I'll take a look at it, but 13 that letter should have no bearing on what we're 14 discussing today that is presented to us at this 15 late date. Okay. Okay. I guess -- is Tom Baird 16 going to -- 17 MR. SLINEY: Your Honor, I think that Dale 18 probably should orient us. 19 MR. SUGERMAN: We can do this a couple of 20 different ways. If you'd like, after I make some 21 brief opening remarks, we can either go through the 22 entire document that's been proposed by the County 23 sort of paragraph -by- paragraph, or I can just 24 answer any questions that you might have. 25 MAYOR NEWELL: Okay. Let's settle that first. Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 5 u 1 MR. SUGERMAN: Sure. Let's figure out how 2 we're going to sequence it. 3 MAYOR NEWELL: As far as I'm concerned, 4 because of the seriousness of this decision and 5 this document, I prefer that we go through 6 paragraph -by- paragraph. Any other commissioner 7 wish to state otherwise? 8 MR. SLINEY: Could I just say one thing? You 9 will not be voting here. I just want to clarify 10 that for the record. Only a decision ultimately 11 would be made in a public session. 12 MAYOR NEWELL: That public session will be 13 when? 14 MR. SLINEY: Well, we're going to be 15 discussing that as we go along. 16 MR. SUGERMAN: Your staff, in the form of 17 Mr. Sliney, Mr. Baird and myself, we've had a 18 series of meetings with the staff members of Palm 19 Beach County, and I would say over the course of 20 the last six months, we have reached, from a staff 21 perspective, what we believe is a stipulated 22 settlement agreement which we are bringing to you 23 this morning for purposes of, one, discussing it 24 and answering any of your questions, and, two, I 25 think we're prepared to make a recommendation that Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE a Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 e www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 6 1 the Commission should accept, what has been L 2 proposed by the County, and we are prepared to 3 defend why we're recommending that. And as the 4 town attorney alluded to, the process for doing 5 that is in a public meeting. We will have a 6 resolution by the Town Commission which will be 7 acted upon to either accept or reject the proposed 8 stipulated settlement agreement. Again, it's going 9 to come with our recommendation that the Commission 10 accept it. 11 What I can do today is I can walk through the 12 document, which is a part -- well, it's all a legal 13 document, but it's mostly an administrative outline 14 of what's going to happen in a relationship between 15 Palm Beach County and the Town of Highland Beach as 16 it relates to the development of Milani Park, and I 17 think that's why Tom Baird is looking to me to walk 18 you through this document because, for the most 19 part, this is administrative stuff. 20 Our two attorneys can weigh in whenever they 21 want but will probably end up weighing in as it 22 relates to the legality of things. But from my 23 perspective, the document is mostly an 24 administrative document of how we're going to close 25 this deal for the development of Milani Park. And Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 7 1 if there aren't any other questions or opening 2 comments by either attorney, I'll just go into the 3 document. 4 MR. SLINEY: That's fine. 5 MR. SUGERMAN: Okay. Any questions? 6 Okay. It begins on this page here. It says 7 "Stipulated Settlement Agreement." It begins with 8 a number of recitals that are captioned as whereas 9 clauses. The first whereas recognizes that the 10 County did submit a special application, special 11 use application, to the Town back in 2001. 12 The second whereas clause recognizes that they 13 abated their special use application during 14 litigation that was pending on the subject u 15 property. 16 The third whereas clause recognizes that the 17 litigation ended, and that on February 27, 2007, 18 the County resumed their request for a special use 19 application on that parcel. 20 They submitted to the Town an updated special 21 assessment use application packet and then the 22 Town -- the fifth whereas clause recognizes that 23 the Town Commission did consider that application 24 at four different hearings: November 4th, 25 December 2nd of 2008; and January 6th and Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 - an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 8 1 April 27th of 2009. And then the Town Commission L/ 2 adopted a resolution approving the special use 3 exception -- I'm sorry, the special use application 4 with 43 conditions. 5 MAYOR NEWELL: Question: What were they, four 6 public meetings we had? 7 MR. SUGERMAN: There were four public -- well, 8 actually -- yes, there were four public meetings, 9 but, to be more accurate, it was a continued public 10 hearing. 11 MAYOR NEWELL: Okay. 12 MR. SUGERMAN: So it was one hearing that was 13 recessed. 14 MAYOR NEWELL: It was a continued public 15 hearing and I believe that we communicated with the 16 general public and Boca Highlands. 17 MR. SUGERMAN: I believe we did throughout as 18 well. 19 MAYOR NEWELL: Thank you. 20 MR. SUGERMAN: So the Town Commission adopted 21 a development order which granted the special use 22 and had 43 conditions of approval and that was 23 through resolution 009 -004. 24 Although it doesn't say it in the next whereas 25 clause, in essence after the Commission adopted or Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 9 u 1 approved the application with the 43 conditions, 2 Palm Beach County took exception to five of those 3 conditions, and when they took exception, they 4 filed a Writ of Petition for Certiorari in the case 5 that's listed in the seventh whereas clause and 6 that case was heard and it was denied by the Court 7 without comment, and so the seventh whereas clause 8 recognizes that their petition for writ was denied 9 by the Court. 10 The eight whereas clause, though, recognizes 11 the ongoing action for declaratory and injunctive 12 relief which has not been acted upon by the Court, 13 so that is still outstanding. However, I think 14 you'll find later on in the document that with -- u 15 if there is an acceptance of the Stipulated 16 Settlement Agreement, it will also settle that 17 outstanding action. 18 The second to the last whereas clause says 19 that both parties wish to resolve the pending 20 appeal and action in order to avoid time and 21 expense of litigation. 22 And the last whereas clause is the one that is 23 sort of the defining statement about the intent of 24 the County, so I'll just read it out loud to you. 25 It says, "Whereas, Palm Beach County intends to Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo company www.esquiresolutions.com I HEARING March 17, 2010 10 1 postpone its development of the subject property to 2 prioritize other means of providing beach access to 3 the citizens of Highland Beach and Palm Beach 4 County," so they're recognizing, before we even get 5 into the meat, that they want to postpone the 6 development of the subject property. 7 And therefore they have proposed the following 8 conditions which they would like the Town 9 Commission to consider. And the first item is 10 Condition Number Five from the 43 conditions. 11 Condition Number Five deals with a fence that we 12 require the County to install on the beach to 13 establish a point of demarcation between what is 14 public land -- that would be the County's beach -- u 15 and private property, and the County is willing to 16 do that except if the County can't obtain permits 17 from the necessary agencies in order to install 18 that fence, and I believe the necessary agency 19 would be the Department of Environmental 20 Protection. If the DDP will not issue them a 21 permit to install a fence, then the County does not 22 want to be held to Condition Number Five and they 23 would not install a fence. And your staff is 24 recommending that we accept that condition that 25 they make the attempt to install the fence; if they Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 11 1 can't get a permit, then they don't have an 2 obligation to install a fence. And I'll stop there 3 as far as the first item of merit in the settlement 4 agreement to see if there's any questions. 5 MAYOR NEWELL: Any questions or comments? 6 MS. ZWICK: I have a question to the 7 attorneys. 8 MR. SUGERMAN: And please make sure you speak 9 up, Vice Mayor. 10 MS. ZWICK: I have a question to either of our 11 attorneys present here on page number two, the: 12 "Whereas, Palm Beach County intends to postpone." 13 The legality of the semantics of the intent is what 14 I question, and it's showing an intent doesn't mean 15 a promise to do it. They can intend and change 16 their minds. It's only an intention. It's not a 17 definite agreement to do so. 18 MR. SLINEY: I think if you look -- when we 19 get further into the document, it basically says 20 there are different periods that they're going to 21 postpone for ten years, there's a possibility of 22 this being in the air, so to speak, up to 20 years, 23 but we can address that as we get to that 24 particular section, okay? 25 MS. ZWICK: I'm just questioning. Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an AleXander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 12 1 MR. BAIRD: Yeah, I understand. That's a good u 2 point. 3 MAYOR NEWELL: Okay. Go ahead. 4 MR. SUGERMAN: On page three, I'm at the 5 bottom. This is now still item one, subsection 6 three. It pertains to Condition Number Six. 7 Condition Number Six dealt with the Town wanting to 8 be satisfied that the registered professional 9 architect that was proposed to be used by the 10 County on the project, and all along we were 11 uncomfortable from a historical perspective with 12 the archeologist. I think I might have said 13 architect earlier, I meant archeologist. We were 14 uncomfortable with the County's choice of an e.i 15 archeologist and so we put in language that said, 16 in essence, there would be to archeologists hired, 17 one by the County and one to be satisfied by the 18 Town. The County responded to that by saying, 19 Well, instead of being forced to hire two 20 archeologists right from the get -go, would the Town 21 find it satisfactory that if we hire, the County 22 hire, an archeologist, if that archeologist is 23 acceptable to the Town, then we don't need to hire 24 a second archeologist; but if the archeologist that 25 the County hires is unacceptable to the Town, then Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 13 u 1 the Town may go ahead and hire its own archeologist 2 and the County will pay for that archeologist. 3 And, so the new language is that if the Town is not 4 satisfied with whom the County uses as their 5 archeologist, then the Town may choose to hire its 6 own archeologist and the County will reimburse the 7 Town for its reasonable expenses. So this 8 paragraph is just in essence instead of hiring two 9 at the beginning, they hire one; if everyone's 10 satisfied with that, they stay with one. If we're 11 not satisfied, we'll hire our own archeologist and 12 they'll pay for it, and we recommended the language 13 that's in the proposed Condition Six should be 14 acceptable. u 15 MAYOR NEWELL: Any questions? 16 Proceed, please. 17 MR. SUGERMAN: Page four, Sub C, this pertains 18 to Condition Number Ten. This deals with the 19 County's application to register the site for 20 designation on the National Register of Historic 21 Places. The Town wanted that registration by the 22 County to take place within one year of the 23 adoption of the settlement agreement. The County 24 has countered with a willingness to register the 25 site within one year, but that one year would be Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 14 1 triggered after their notice of intent to actually 2 resume the development. 3 MAYOR NEWELL: So that means that could be 20 4 years from now. 5 MR. SUGERMAN: That's correct. And, so here's 6 the distinction. The distinction is, if we hold 7 out and ask them to register within one year of the 8 settlement agreement, then the property being on 9 the National Register would bring with it all of 10 the burdens of being registered as a National 11 Historic Place. Should the County decide during 12 the next ten years or even the next 20 years to 13 sell that property and not build a beach, if the 14 designation which goes with the property is wrapped 15 around the property, they would have a much more 16 difficult time selling the property if that's what 17 they choose to do, so they don't want to have a 18 National Register of Historic Places designation on 19 property that they may want to put on the open 20 market and that's why they've countered that, okay, 21 if we're going to go ahead and develop it as a 22 park, we're not opposed to registering it and we'll 23 do so within one year of our notice of intent to 24 actually resume the development. But they don't 25 want to register it within one year of the Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 15 u 1 settlement agreement because they may never build a 2 park and they don't want that noose of the registry 3 around their neck. 4 MAYOR NEWELL: Is it within the confines of 5 this meeting to discuss the possibility of the sale 6 of that property? 7 MR. SUGERMAN: Sure. 8 MAYOR NEWELL: All right. If we come to the 9 point where the -- we're considering to sell the 10 property, we all know who the potential buyer would 11 be, is there anything -- does the Town have any say 12 or any wedge in that transaction? 13 MR. SLINEY: You mean just from a buyer /seller 14 standpoint? u 15 MAYOR NEWELL: Well, I would assume right now 16 it's zoned -- 17 MR. SUGERMAN: Government service district. 18 MAYOR NEWELL: -- government service district. 19 MR. BAIRD: Let's say just, in my opinion, the 20 prospective buyer who just appeared today wanted to 21 buy, I guess as I remember the original 22 1 87 agreement, that she has, theoretically, that 23 right of first refusal and I guess the County would 24 have to deal with her first, and then I would 25 assume that if they couldn't make a deal, the Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 16 1 County would be free to put it on the open market 2 subject to the designation that the property is 3 currently zoned for, and then whoever bought it I 4 guess would have to come in if they were not happy 5 with the designation and I would think they would 6 not be happy with the designation because it's GSD, 7 they'd have to come in and convince the Town that 8 that's the wrong category. 9 MAYOR NEWELL: Now, when they -- the Milani 10 family has the right of first refusal on it. Does 11 that mean -- I don't have any idea of the numbers. 12 Let's put a number on it. Let's say they offer $10 13 million for it and there's somebody out there that 14 says, "We'll give you 12 million," is the County 15 stuck with that 10 million? 16 MR. BAIRD: Well, in my opinion they've got 17 to -- In other words, they have to use good faith 18 in that. In other words, they -- I would imagine 19 how it would be is the County would notify people 20 that this parcel is up for sale and then we 21 would -- we want "X" million dollars for it. You 22 know, again, that's really between -- the County is 23 not really a party to that, you know, so they have 24 to work out their legal issue. 25 If Mrs. Milani felt that they were not being Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 17 u 1 fair and tried to get Mrs. Milani out of the 2 picture somehow, then she might have a lawsuit 3 against them, again on the right of first refusal. 4 It's a little hard to anticipate how those 5 negotiations would go. 6 MAYOR NEWELL: But the Town would still be in 7 control of the zoning? 8 MR. BAIRD: Yeah. Whoever buys it. We don't 9 care who owns it. Whoever owns it is subject to 10 whatever the zoning is. 11 MAYOR NEWELL: To this whole thing, 12 whatever this -- the final decision the 13 Commission -- the Commission makes a final decision 14 they have to accept that as well at that public u 15 meeting, what is the likelihood if we make a 16 decision that is not favorable to the Milani family 17 that they would try to sue the Town? 18 MR. SLINEY: It's hard to speculate being 19 Mrs. Milani tends to be litigious, but I think the 20 Town needs to go ahead on the basis of -- that's 21 why the three of us are recommending this to make 22 the Town -- we're going to rec -- we have 23 recommended that this agreement is, we think, in 24 the Town's best interests. We can't be bound by or 25 worry about what the other party might do, in my Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 18 1 opinion. 2 MAYOR NEWELL: Okay. But I think that 3 question needs to be asked. 4 MR. SLINEY: No, I don't disagree. 5 MAYOR NEWELL: Any other questions? 6 Continue. 7 MR. SUGERMAN: So now I'm on the bottom of 8 page four, sub D, which relates to Condition Number 9 14, and Condition Number 14 deals with the 10 Memorandum of Agreement that is a requirement of 11 moving forward with the project, and the Memorandum 12 of Agreement would have to be entered into by the 13 County, by the State Historic Preservation Officer, 14 by the Miccosukee and Seminole tribes of Florida, 15 by the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and by the Town 16 of Highland Beach. That is a requirement that we 17 have put on the County and it is Condition Number 18 14. And the County has told us that they are 19 willing to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement. 20 However, if any of those parties that are listed in 21 Condition Number 14 are unresponsive or 22 nonresponsive to entering into a Memorandum of 23 Agreement with the County, the County does not want 24 their project held up and so they've asked, in the 25 settlement, that if they do not receive a response Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive an Alexander Gallo Company Boca Raton, FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 19 u 1 from any one of the parties that are outlined in 2 the proposed Memorandum of Agreement within 90 days 3 of inviting their participation, that the County 4 will be excused from the requirement of waiting for 5 any nonresponsive party beyond the 90 days, and we 6 thought that was reasonable. 7 MAYOR NEWELL: Questions? 8 MR. PAGLIARO: I guess -- the attorneys, I 9 guess, can answer this. I just have a problem with 10 the word reasonable. I mean, that's kind of an 11 open- ended, it's in the lap of the County. What is 12 reasonable to the County and what is reasonable to 13 the Town of Highland Beach may be two different 14 things. How do we -- I need to have that \1 15 clarified. I don't feel comfortable that the 16 County is saying that they will make a reasonable, 17 quote /end quote, effort to contact. Because I 18 remember the earlier hearings, that seemed to be a 19 contentious on the part of the County that that was 20 very important to them because I think they had 21 some difficulties with one of the tribes, if I 22 recall. 23 MR. SLINEY: I'll let Tom Baird answer that. 24 MR. BAIRD: Thank you. If you look at page j 25 five, the underlined portion at the top of page i Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 20 1 five, it explains what a reasonable effort is. It 2 explains that if, as the County is going to seek 3 the participation of the tribes and SHPO by sending 4 a regular and a certified mail letter, that letter 5 is something that myself and Mr. Sliney will agree 6 with the County is an appropriate letter to those 7 entities, and if then after 90 days there's no 8 response, the County is relieved of the obligation 9 of entering into an agreement with those parties. 10 We believe that that is reasonable because, to take 11 another position on it, if it were open- ended, if 12 there wasn't a 90 -day timeframe, then, potentially, 13 not only the County but the Town, who is going to 14 be a party to that agreement, could wait for 15 whatever length of time, six months, eight months, 16 and not know who was going to be a party to the 17 agreement, so we had to put a timeframe on it and 18 we wanted to make sure that we defined reasonable 19 by crafting the letter ourselves and giving that 20 letter to the County and saying, "Okay, this is 21 what you've got to send to the tribes and SHPO." 22 MS. ZWICK: Sir, I understand what you 23 explained here, but taking a hypothetical point of 24 view, if one of these organizations, say the 25 Seminole Nation of Oklahoma or Miccosukee of Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite e Drive 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Alexander Gallo Company Boca Raton, FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 21 1 Florida, refused to agree to a negotiation or step 2 in in any way and object to the park, quote, would 3 that bring any problems for the Town or it just 4 would be a legal matter between the County and the 5 entity that they're trying to enter into the 6 negotiation with them? 7 MR. BAIRD: The time for the tribes, to use 8 them as an example, to have weighed in on their 9 perspective regarding the development of this park 10 were the four public hearings that you conducted, 11 and for them to comment on the impact of the 12 County's proposed development of the park, they 13 chose not to do so at that time. In essence, the 14 Commission gave them a second opportunity to do 15 that by requiring this Memorandum of Agreement, so 16 they do now have a second opportunity to comment. 17 However, if their past behavior is any indication 18 of their future behavior in that regard, it can be 19 expected that they're not going to participate. 20 You may recall from the hearings: There was 21 some correspondence from the Miccosukee and a 22 representative did appear at one of your hearings, 23 but ultimately they never offered a firm position 24 as to how they felt about the development of the 25 park. So, to answer the last part of your Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 N W Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 22 1 question, I don't think there's any exposure to the 2 Town in terms of any additional litigation or 3 administrative proceedings that one of the tribes 4 or one of the unhappy parties could cause to the 5 Town. 6 MS. ZWICK: Thank you. 7 MAYOR NEWELL: The individual who showed up, 8 was he an authorized representative? I don't 9 recall him being an authorized representative. 10 MR. BAIRD: He was not a member of the tribe. 11 He was sort of an administrative officer or 12 executive director type of person that works for 13 the tribe and he was also the individual who had 14 written a letter that was part of your record. 15 MAYOR NEWELL: Anything else? 16 Continue, please. 17 MR. SUGERMAN: Still at the bottom of page 18 five, we're in subsection lower case "e" now which 19 deals with Condition Number 43. Condition 43 -- 20 and, by the way, this is the fifth of the five 21 conditions, so this is the last one they objected 22 to. Condition 43 deals with the perimeter 23 landscaping and the wall, and that perimeter 24 landscaping and the wall were to be -- will -- I'm 25 sorry, will be installed within one year of the Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive an Alexander Gallo Company Boca Raton, FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 23 1 approval of the settlement agreement and a new 2 landscaping plan will be submitted as an exhibit to 3 the settlement agreement, and we have now also 4 added language to the agreement that the eastern 5 boundary of Parcel B, the vacant lot, must have a 6 means of physically restricting vehicular access to 7 that parcel. 8 The Commission might remember that it was 9 Condition 43 that was added on the floor of the 10 Commission chambers during the last hearing at a 11 request of the folks of Boca Highlands, but there 12 was a little bit of confusion or maybe even 13 disagreement as to what that wall should be, if it 14 should be concrete block, if it should be chain u 15 link with some kind of opaque screening or 16 non - opaque screening, and because we did it on the 17 floor of the Commission Chambers, we didn't have a 18 real good sense of what the wall and the perimeter 19 landscaping should look like. We have now gotten 20 down to the fact that it will be a concrete block 21 wall, it will be no higher than six feet, we even 22 have a landscaping plan, and all of that will be 23 attached to the settlement agreement. 24 The one thing that was added between the 25 second and the third to the last negotiating Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 24 1 session was we also asked specifically for some 2 sort of perimeter fencing on the east side of the 3 western parcel, so that would be the vacant lot up 4 against AlA. 5 MR. SORRELLI: Hold on a second. You lost me. 6 MR. SUGERMAN: All right. We asked at our 7 last negotiation session with the County that they 8 also provide some kind of perimeter protection for 9 the vacant parcel, which is the west parcel, and 10 provide it on the east side which is up against 11 AlA, and we were holding out for a fence and we 12 wanted to have a real nice decorative fence. The 13 County's response to our wanting to have a real 14 nice decorative fence was, "You're asking us to 15 sink lots and lots of money into a project," as 16 we'll find out in a few minutes, "probably won't 17 get built," so they resisted spending a lot of 18 money putting up a nice decorative fence against 19 AlA and instead they came back with language which 20 says they will install a means of physically 21 restricting vehicular access to that parcel. 22 That's the best we could get out of them. So I'm 23 not sure we can expect -- I think we proposed one 24 of those split rail fences. I'm not sure we can 25 expect that out of them. I think the best we can Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive an Alexander Gallo Company Boca Raton, FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 25 u 1 get is we're going to leave it in their hands to 2 install a means of physically restricting vehicular 3 access. The good news is we'll get to see it 4 because they have got to tell us what they're going 5 to do and that will be attached to the agreement in 6 what's called Exhibit C. 7 MR. SLINEY: We felt that was important 8 because of the complaints at the hearings that UPS 9 trucks or whatever just go over this, so we wanted 10 to have a method of blocking that happen. And as 11 Phil sales, we'll see what is on the exhibit and 12 the plan. And I understand the County's point of 13 view of not wanting to sink a lot of money into 14 that and so we agreed to that. 15 MAYOR NEWELL: The police cars parking there 16 and talking, the Commissioners all hear that from 17 everyone. 18 MR. SUGERMAN: All the more reason why we 19 would like them to restrict vehicular access to the 20 western parcel. 21 MAYOR NEWELL: Any questions on this? 22 MR. SUGERMAN: There are a couple more 23 paragraphs on the top of page six that deal with 24 the wall, the perimeter landscaping, and 25 restricting access. I don't think I need to go Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 26 1 into anymore detail. 2 And then, sub F on page six is kind of the 3 defining moment for allowing the settlement to take 4 place. It says, "The Development Order will be 5 amended to allow for completion of all conditions 6 of approval within two years following the date of 7 the County's notice of intent to resume development 8 consistent with the intent of Article II, Section 9 30- 21(g)(2)(b)" of the Town's code, "except that 10 Conditions 20, 22 and 43," which are all the 11 landscape, the cleanup, the early stuff, that 12 "shall be completed within one year of the 13 execution of the Settlement Agreement." 14 Now, there's been a new wrinkle that came up 15 only during our last negotiating session with them 16 and it begins at the bottom of page six and it is 17 sub two, and why don't I just read it into the 18 record to see if you have any questions. What this 19 section does is, the parties are acknowledging the 20 existence of a property line dispute between Palm 21 Beach County and Boca Highlands Condominium 22 Association regarding the perimeter of the subject 23 property. It goes on to say, "The Town of Highland 24 Beach agrees to extend the deadlines for 25 performance of the requirements of Conditions 20, Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive an Alexander Gallo Company Boca Raton, FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 27 u 1 22 and 43 - -" again, walls and landscaping -- "if 2 litigation is initiated regarding the property line 3 dispute between Palm Beach County and Boca 4 Highlands Condominium Association that prevents the 5 County from meeting the timing requirements of 6 Conditions 20, 22 and 43." Remember, if we hadn't 7 written this agreement, they've got one year to do 8 perimeter landscaping, walls and all the cleanup. 9 It goes on to say, "The time extension may be 10 granted administratively by the building official 11 upon written request by the County." That is, if 12 this litigation becomes protracted and it takes 13 more than a year, they don't want to be bound to 14 have to do the perimeter landscaping and the wall 15 until that litigation is finished, and the reason 16 why they've been -- they put in here that they want 17 this time extension to be granted administratively: 18 because they do not want to have to come back -- 19 the County does not want to have to come back and 20 stand before the Commission asking for a further 21 amendment to the conditions of approval, where you 22 would have to go through a very long, arduous 23 public hearing process with notice and all of that, 24 and so they put the language in that if the County 25 and Boca Highlands can get beyond their litigation Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 28 1 and resolve the property dispute, but it takes more 2 than a year, they just want to be able to ask the 3 building official to grant them an extension while 4 that litigation is going on instead of coming back 5 to the Town Commission. 6 MAYOR NEWELL: Why can't they use that as a 7 way to prolong that? 8 In other words, why can't they drag their feet 9 in settling with Boca Highlands and take this thing 10 out for four or five years? 11 MR. SUGERMAN: They could. I believe they 12 could. 13 MR. PAGLIARO: That concerns me, too. I don't 14 understand this. If -- And maybe this is too U 15 simplistic, but they have the survey. One party 16 says the boundary is not -- we see it as something 17 wrong. 18 I mean, why is this thing being prolonged over 19 something that can be done, I believe, in a 20 reasonable way by surveyors getting out there, see 21 what the issues are. We have the documents in Town 22 Hall with regard to lines. Why is this -- it seems 23 to me that, I agree with the mayor, it's another 24 thing to be dragged on. They've known that there's 25 been a dispute over the property line, both the Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 29 1 County. Why haven't both parties or one of the 2 parties pursued it and say, "Let's get it this out 3 of the way now ?" Maybe you can help me with that. 4 Maybe there's something I don't see in this. 5 MR. SUGERMAN: Do you want an administrative 6 answer or do you want a legal answer? 7 MR. PAGLIARO: All of the above. 8 MR. SLINEY: Let me discuss. This came up at 9 the most recent session we had with them. 10 Apparently, each side, the County and Boca 11 Highlands, have a survey or title insurance or 12 something like that both saying that they own 13 whatever this disputed parcel is. Now, it sounds 14 strange, doesn't it? But that's -- that's what's 15 been represented to us, and that basically is an 16 issue between the two of them. I don't know who 17 has the incentive to settle, if either one. It 18 seems like, you know, Boca Highland is always in 19 the middle of stuff down there. I don't really 20 think the County wants to drag this out. I don't 21 think that that's their intent, but if they 22 can't -- You know, as you say, it sounds sensible: 23 You get surveyors, have them agree on what it is, 24 but apparently that hasn't happened. So, I don't 25 know what else to say. Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 \� Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 30 1 I just don't get the feeling that they're 2 trying to drag this out, but it was a new wrinkle. 3 It was just brought up at our last session. This 4 was not even in the prior drafts because we didn't 5 know there was a problem between Boca High and the 6 County over this issue. 7 MAYOR NEWELL: Well, the problem I have with 8 what you're saying is, you're saying, well, the 9 people you're talking to right now, today, you 10 don't think are going to drag it out. Those people 11 may be gone tomorrow or next week or next month and 12 we may be dealing with new people who say, "Well, 13 geez, this is a great way for us to drag this out," 14 ends up making us look bad. u 15 MR. SLINEY: I can't dispute that. I guess 16 it's like any settlement agreement whether it's a 17 divorce agreement or whatever it is: You look at 18 the whole agreement overall and see whether it has 19 more benefits or problems with it, and I guess, I 20 sure, I don't dispute that that could be a problem. 21 My opinion in looking over the whole agreement as a 22 whole is what it achieves for the Town and I think 23 one of the reasons the three of us are recommending 24 it, so -- 25 MS. ZWICK: Just as a point of information: Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Alexander Gallo Company Boca Raton, FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 31 u 1 This question of the boundary line of the property 2 came up very recently as far as Boca Highlands, 3 although it was in the back of their minds earlier. 4 Sometime ago the question came up that people in 5 trucks were using the property, gaining access over 6 the lot because there was nothing to stop them from 7 that open property. If they drove a truck, they 8 could come right through to the driveway in front 9 of Evanton Baye, which is a series of townhouses, 10 and enter any street leading to condos on -- that 11 comprise Boca Highlands. The people at Boca 12 Highlands, I understand, were very upset with this, 13 and since the County was not willing to do anything 14 because there's still a matter of litigation, they u 15 proposed extending a hedge fence that they had 16 starting at the main entry and running to cover the 17 area behind the townhouse that sits at the corner 18 where you enter, the southern entrance to Boca 19 Highlands, and they wanted to extend -- put the 20 hedge all the way down the entire length of the 21 property to protect entrants. I mean, an 22 individual could still get through at any time but 23 restricting the vehicle entry onto property of Boca 24 Highlands. 25 And I remember somebody talking to me, and I Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 32 1 truly I don't remember who, but it was somebody u 2 from the board or active on the board of directors 3 or governors at Boca Highlands saying, "Well, if we 4 put in the landscaping, what's going to happen when 5 they want to put the fence in ?" And I said, "I 6 don't know. You have to decide that with yourself, 7 but if you think it's going to be protracted, put 8 in the hedges that you want, and, if necessary, you 9 can move them some of them, most of them can 10 survive the move, and, if not, it's only a matter 11 of a few -- you have to move it closer to the 12 street if you are on county property." And, 13 therefore -- and then, shortly thereafter I saw 14 that they did hedge that whole length of property u 15 and the hedge has grown, it's been the protection 16 that's been used. 17 Now, from what I understanding and what I've 18 heard, only, I've never seen it, the County 19 approached or sent a letter to Boca Highlands 20 instructing them to please remove their hedge in 21 preparation for their putting the concrete block 22 fence up or protection there, and that's when Boca 23 Highlands came up and said, "Well, this is our 24 property. You can put your fence right next to 25 it." And that's the dispute, as Mr. Young Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 33 u 1 indicated in his comments in the open meeting. 2 They believe that they're almost ready for 3 settlement of that dispute, and if that's so, and I 4 don't know what the discussion has been, the County 5 is showing that they are ready to settle something 6 because they do want to go ahead with this. So, I 7 think I can follow the intent that they are 8 following through. They were getting ready to put 9 the fence up. They were not trying to drag their 10 feet. And I don't think that the Boca Highlands 11 wants them to drag their feet either. So -- 12 MR. SLINEY: It's in Boca Highlands' interest 13 to settle that so they can get what they really 14 want. 15 MS. ZWICK: Yeah. They want that fence up and 16 that's an important feature. And if you recall, I 17 made the motion in support of their plea. And I 18 assume and I hope that the settlement over this 19 boundary dispute will come to an end very shortly 20 and be out of the way, because I don't think 21 it's -- I don't think it's a major stumbling block. 22 It's a minor irritation. 23 MAYOR NEWELL: All these things up to here 24 have these in a year, within two years, within 90 25 days and everything else. Why can't this also have Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 34 1 an end in a specific amount of time? u 2 MR. SLINEY: I don't -- you know, from my 3 perspective, if it's a true boundary dispute, and I 4 don't know whether it's a really a true boundary 5 dispute or somebody just stuck the hedges there, 6 maybe it's an encroachment, there's no way to - 7 you know, if you had a true boundary dispute, that 8 could go to court and -- 9 MAYOR NEWELL: It could go on for years. 10 MR. SLINEY: You know how fast courts operate. 11 You know, they don't operate very fast. So I don't 12 know that I have a definitive solution on that, 13 although -- 14 MAYOR NEWELL: Why isn't the solution that 15 they have very limited time? 16 MR. SLINEY: Well, I guess we can 17 counter - propose on that. That's -- 18 MAYOR NEWELL: I mean, everything else up 19 until now has been, you know, they throw in a year, 20 but they want, you know 90 days to do this, they 21 want a year to do this, they want two years to do 22 that. 23 MR. SLINEY: My only feeling on that is, it's 24 actually -- I -- I think it's in both of their 25 parties' interest to -- to get the thing resolved. Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 35 u 1 I mean, I don't know that it benefits -- I can 2 understand what you're saying that maybe it's the 3 County's benefit to drag it out so they don't have 4 to do anything. But I don't -- 5 MAYOR NEWELL: Absolutely. You're talking to 6 people today you who may not be here. 7 MR. SLINEY: I don't dispute that. 8 MR. SUGERMAN: If I may add to that a couple 9 of things: One, I've talked to both parties about 10 this separately and there is no desire to drag 11 anything out. In fact, both parties want to get 12 the wall up and get the landscaping taken care of 13 quickly. So, my sense, in talking to both parties, 14 is neither of them want to drag the thing out, they 15 want to get it resolved. However, it may take 16 awhile because, as Tom said, they each hold either 17 a surveyor's report, and we may even have heard a 18 deed, that shows they each own a line in different 19 places, a recorded deed. They each have a recorded 20 deed that shows their line is in two different 21 places, so this may take awhile to straighten out. 22 But to more specifically answer the mayor's 23 question as to why everything else has got the 90 24 days or one year, that's because all those 25 timeframes are between the two parties in the Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 36 1 settlement agreement, which is the County and the u 2 Town. Those two parties can control the timeframes 3 between themselves, but in this section we have a 4 third party that neither of us have any control 5 over, so it would be very difficult for us to put a 6 stipulated timeframe on the County when we don't 7 control the behavior of Boca Highlands, and so 8 that's why we thought it was fair and reasonable to 9 let the dispute between those two parties run its 10 course, and that if they can't get the wall and the 11 landscaping installed within one year because the 12 litigation is going on, that instead of having to 13 come back to the Town Commission and reopen the 14 entire development order that the building official u 15 could just sign off on an extension. Again, we 16 thought that was reasonable and we have no reason 17 to believe that the two parties, that being the 18 County and Boca Highlands, can't resolve this 19 dispute because I believe they both want to. 20 MAYOR NEWELL: Well, I got to tell you: The 21 rest of the Town of Highland Beach about that park, 22 the biggest thing: The citizens of this town don't 23 like the looks of that property on the west side, 24 and all we're doing here is giving them a plaintive 25 to go on forever to do nothing. And this is what I Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Alexander Gallo Company Boca Raton, FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 37 u 1 hear from the residents. 2 MR. SUGERMAN: We do run that risk with the 3 language that is presently in the -- 4 MAYOR NEWELL: I don't think I can be in favor 5 of this as it is in place. I'm only one person. 6 MR. SORRELLI: Tom, we can't get a date from 7 them? They wouldn't give us a date? 8 MR. SLINEY: Well, in this type of dispute, I 9 don't -- If you have conflicting claims to real 10 estate, there is no way that -- other than we can 11 go back and say that the Commission won't sign it 12 unless you pick a date that -- you know, you've got 13 this amount of time to do it, and we can take it 14 back to them and ask them if they'll agree to that. u 15 That's an answer to your question. Then they -- 16 MR. SORRELLI: I see something out there that 17 I don't like it. What are they thinking? 18 MR. SLINEY: Well, I guess probably the 19 County, who we dealt with, we haven't dealt with 20 Boca High, is saying, "We don't know how long it 21 will take us to resolve this with Boca High." 22 MR. PAGLIARO: May I ask another question, 23 too? With regard to the documents that each 24 claimed that they have surveys that show where the 25 property line is, don't we have -- aren't they on i Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 38 1 file here in Town Hall? They're not on file. 2 MR. SUGERMAN: No. 3 MR. PAGLIARO: Well, how long do they go back 4 to? 5 MR. SUGERMAN: They have no obligation to file 6 those here. If they're filed anywhere, they're 7 filed with the county clerk. We don't file deeds 8 here. 9 MAYOR NEWELL: And even if they did or we had 10 copies of them, our interpretation of it is 11 meaningless, correct? 12 MR. SUGERMAN: Correct. 13 MR. SLINEY: It's certainly possible that 14 there can be a real boundary error. I mean, 15 surveyors are human. You know, that property was 16 subdivided a number of times down there. You know, 17 they may have to do quitclaim deeds back and forth, 18 I don't know. That's how normally you solve it is 19 when you get a resolution from a survey standpoint 20 and then you resolve by transfer of deed one way or 21 the other, so I -- that's my best answer. 22 MR. PAGLIARO: If this is going to be a sticky 23 issue, isn't there some way that we can say, "Boca 24 Highlands, County, resolve this issue. Get 25 whomever it is we can get, surveyor or whatever, Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 N/ Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive an Boca Raton, FL 33431 Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 39 1 take a look at both those surveys, do the due 2 diligence with regard to checking, back checking, 3 and then get somebody in there to do what has to be 4 done to resolve it." It's either Boca Highlands or 5 it's not Boca Highlands, it's the County's. 6 MAYOR NEWELL: The only one who is going to 7 get in there and resolve it is a judge. 8 MR. SUGERMAN: Well, let me add this since 9 we're in closed door session and this won't come 10 out until after this is settled. Again in talking 11 to both parties, this really isn't a dispute over 12 four feet of a line here or there. What this 13 really is a dispute about is who's going to pay for 14 the moving of a water meter that's in this location u 15 and there's a sewer line that goes here, there's 16 also a couple of other irrigation devices, I think 17 the irrigation heads need to be moved, too, is what 18 it comes down to. 19 MR. PAGLIARO: Pettiness. 20 MR. SUGERMAN: Well, it depends on who -- you 21 know, which side of fence you're on as to the 22 pettiness. 23 Again, in talking to both parties, I think 24 they're going to work it out. There's probably 25 30 -- this is a wild guess because nobody's told Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esqui resolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 40 1 me -- 30 or 40 thousand dollars of moving stuff u 2 here to get this resolved. And until one or the 3 other party blinks as to who is going to pay for 4 moving that stuff, we're out in left field, you 5 know. So -- and I'm not a party to those 6 negotiations. You know, I just -- I keep on 7 talking to folks. That's what I understand the 8 problem is. I don't know if the County's going to 9 step up and say, "Okay, we'll move everything, 10 we'll pay for it," or Boca Highlands says, "Split 11 it with us," I don't know. I'm not really the -- 12 I'm not in the negotiation, but that's what's going 13 on here. And, so I have a sense they're going to 14 work it out. There's no reason for them to drag u 15 their feet. They will work it out, I think. 16 MR. SLINEY: I have a -- 17 MAYOR NEWELL: -- (inaudible) what somebody 18 thinks. 19 MR. SLINEY: Well, I have a comment as what 20 you could do. I mean, we'll go through the whole 21 agreement and we'll find areas that you have 22 problems with. I mean, you can always put this 23 agreement off until they resolve their issue, 24 that's one way of handling it, and you can go back 25 to the County and say, "We're not comfortable with Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIR 2385 NW Executive Center Drive an Alexander Gallo Company Boca Raton, FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 41 1 that clause. Once you guys -- assuming there's no 2 other issues here, once you guys solve that 3 problem, we'll pick it up and move it forward 4 again." That's one way you can do it. So, I think 5 we kind of go through the agreement and find out 6 which areas aren't -- the Town's not happy with, 7 and then we'll go back to the County and say, "the 8 Commission's not happy with the following items." 9 Yeah. Because I don't know how else we can do 10 this. I mean, in that sense, if you're concerned 11 about it, we just -- 12 MAYOR NEWELL: Well, you hear three of us. 13 MR. SLINEY: Yeah, that's why I'm saying it. 14 I don't know what language you can put in that the 15 County because -- or -- because they don't know how 16 long it's going to take. So, assuming, like Dale 17 says, they both want to solve, so solve it already 18 and then we'll go back. 19 MAYOR NEWELL: Maybe they need some intensive. 20 MR. PAGLIARO: Just to help me if I may: 21 Dale, when did this issue -- this was a relatively 22 recent issue? 23 MR. SUGERMAN: Well, no. The dispute about 24 the boundary has been there for 20 years. 25 MAYOR NEWELL: Okay. It's been there for 20 Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 42 1 years -- 2 MR. SUGERMAN: Maybe even longer. 3 MAYOR NEWELL: -- then why should we accept 4 the fact -- and I'm not criticizing your judgment, 5 but why should we accept your judgment that it's 6 going to be settled very shortly? 7 MR. SUGERMAN: Here's why. I'm give you the 8 answer to that question. I believe the County has 9 put on the table a wonderful solution for this 10 commission. And if this commission wants to set 11 this what I believe is a wonderful solution for you 12 aside to wait for them to work out their 13 differences from Boca Highlands, who knows what 14 might get removed from this wonderful solution six 15 months or a year from now because the boundary 16 dispute between two parties does not get resolved. 17 This is a wonderful solution for this commission. 18 MAYOR NEWELL: I have a real problem when a 19 salesman starts telling me that he's got a good 20 product for me today; if I don't buy it today, it 21 may not here tomorrow. 22 MR. SUGERMAN: And if you don't want to hear 23 that from your town manager -- 24 MAYOR NEWELL: I don't. 25 MR. SUGERMAN: -- then tell your town manager Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive an Alexander Gallo company Boca Raton, FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 43 1 to pack up and go away, which he's willing to do. 2 MAYOR NEWELL: We don't take threats either. 3 MR. SUGERMAN: It's not a threat. It's a 4 suggestion. I'm suggesting to you that we've 5 worked this for a year. We've spent lots and lots 6 of time. It has not been easy getting to this 7 point. 8 MAYOR NEWELL: Just a minute. That's your job 9 and we pay both of these individuals. 10 MR. SUGERMAN: I understand that, Mayor. All 11 I'm suggesting is -- 12 MAYOR NEWELL: No, you're not. You're trying 13 to hold a gun to our head. 14 MR. SUGERMAN: All right. I'll sit and be 15 quiet and answer your questions rather than giving 16 my opinion. If my opinion is not invited, I won't 17 give it. 18 MAYOR NEWELL: Your opinion is always invited, 19 but don't except us to just accept because it's 20 your opinion. We have opinions, too. 21 MR. SUGERMAN: I was not asking you to accept 22 it. I was putting it out on the table. 23 MAYOR NEWELL: No, you were telling us you 24 spent all this time and all this negotiations and 25 it was all going to waste and we should cave Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 44 1 because of that. 2 MR. SUGERMAN: I didn't say it was going to 3 waste, nor did I suggest you should cave in. 4 MR. SORRELLI: I'd like to hear the man. I 5 would like to hear him. 6 MAYOR NEWELL: He should (inaudible) -- 7 MR. SUGERMAN: I think I'm done because I've 8 lost my train of thought. They were not prepared 9 remarks. I was speaking from my heart and my mind 10 and I've lost my concentration. 11 MR. PAGLIARO: I'd like you to go back, if you 12 can gather your thoughts, because I liked what I 13 was hearing in terms of that this may be a way in 14 which to move the County and Boca Highlands to make 15 a decision that would be helpful to all parties 16 concerned. Primarily the party that I'm concerned 17 about is the Town of Highland Beach. So if you 18 could kind of run that by us again, if you will. 19 MR. SUGERMAN: Well, okay. Mr. Sliney 20 suggested here is a way you can deal with the issue 21 of discomfort by the Commission about leaving this 22 open -ended until those two parties settle their 23 dispute. He suggested that you set all of this 24 aside, put it on hold until they settle their 25 dispute, and then we'll pick it back up again. And Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive an Alexander Gallo Company Boca Raton, FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 45 1 I've heard a couple "I like that ideas," I saw a 2 couple of heads shaking "yes." Well, I just want 3 the Commission to think broader than just one 4 option and I was throwing another option out there, 5 and my option was, be careful what you ask for or 6 what you wish, because I believe this is a great 7 package. I won't comment about how much time or 8 effort was spent in getting it to you. I believe 9 it's a great package. 10 If you set it aside until they work out their 11 dispute, which may be six months, it might be six 12 weeks, six months or six years, and this package 13 sits on the sidelines, things change. The County 14 commissioners change. Offers of settlement might 15 get withdrawn. I'm just suggesting to the 16 Commission: Keep your eyes and ears open that if 17 we set this aside for whatever period of time, you 18 may not enjoy it as an offer in the future. That 19 was my comment. 20 MR. SLINEY: Let me pick up on that. 21 MAYOR NEWELL: The only one I heard made that 22 suggestion was the town attorney. I didn't hear 23 anybody else agreeing to that. 24 MR. SUGERMAN: I heard two agreements and I 25 saw one head nodding yes. Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www. esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 46 1 MR. SLINEY: Well, let me pick it up. As I 2 said maybe 15 or 20 minutes ago, it's like a 3 divorce settlement: There may be things in here 4 you don't like. And I said we had -- three of us 5 think, and I agree with what Dale said, this is 6 a -- we think overall a favorable agreement, okay? 7 We can't guarantee everything. I think that 8 the political situation in the County has changed. 9 I think they have come to some realities that, one, 10 they really don't have the money to do this. Who 11 represents this district and his or her attitude 12 makes a lot of difference. The previous occupant 13 of District Four, I believe, has a different 14 attitude than the present occupant of the u 15 Commission in District Four. So, just like 16 people's terms are up on this commission or any 17 other commission, I agree, things can change. 18 We can't -- This is the present situation that 19 basically allows this matter to be postponed, as 20 we'll see, for at least ten years, and a park may 21 never be built. And -- so I think that if that's 22 the goal, then the ultimate goal is to basically 23 postpone this for at least ten years. And there's 24 a provision in here that we got out, and we'll 25 discuss later, basically saying if they don't Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE and Gallo Company Suite eDrive 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 Alex www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 47 1 comply with the timeframes in this agreement, the 2 development order will be null and void, okay? 3 They want to have a provision in there, which 4 we got out, that basically says if they can't build 5 it, then we have to agree to buy it. We thought 6 that would be a terrible provision. We wouldn't 7 agree to that and that's not in there. 8 Because the County has an investment in this 9 property, whether we like it or not, they have an 10 investment and they have to protect their citizens 11 as far as they can to get something out of the 12 property if they don't ultimately do it. They kind 13 of gave away, in my opinion, a good card to the 14 Town. 15 So, you all may find things in here that you 16 don't like. The issue is, do you like the overall 17 settlement or not? That's how I look at it. So, 18 those are my comments. 19 MS. TRINLEY: I would just like to remind 20 everyone that we have no sway over the actions of 21 Boca Highlands. There's no way we can get involved 22 in their business, so that's a very important key 23 to this. 24 MAYOR NEWELL: Any other questions, comments? 25 Let's move on. Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 48 1 MR. SUGERMAN: We're still on page seven, but 2 we're in subsection three now called Project 3 Postponement. And this is another one of the key 4 items to the settlement agreement. I won't read 5 it, you probably already read it, but basically 6 what subparagraph three says is that the County 7 agrees not to proceed with developing the park 8 except for the compliance for Conditions 20, 22, 24 9 and 43, which is again landscaping, signage, 10 perimeter walls, those sort of things, and they 11 will not proceed for a period of ten years from the 12 date of the adoption of the amended development 13 order. At the end of five years of that ten -year 14 period, they will give us a status report as to 15 what they're planning and what they think they're 16 going to do, and the status report is for 17 information purposes only, but shall, at a minimum, 18 include what actions the County has taken to 19 increase beach access at other beach parks in the 20 District, which is the whole premise of why they're 21 moving forward with entering into the settlement 22 agreement. 23 MAYOR NEWELL: Questions? 24 You three are in agreement that ten years is 25 the best we can do? Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 49 u 1 MR. BAIRD: Yes. 2 MR. SLINEY: Yes. 3 MR. SUGERMAN: Yes. Which leads to sub four 4 on the bottom of page seven. The County has asked 5 for the right to extend the postponement at its 6 sole option for two additional periods of five 7 years each for a maximum postponement of up to 20 8 years. And, more specifically, kind of reiterate 9 the question that the Mayor had, we went in asking 10 for 20 years, that's what we attempted to get from 11 the County. The County staff told us in response 12 they could not sell that to their administration 13 and, in particular, to their elected officials. 14 Postponing 20 years was just too long of a horizon u 15 for them, and so what they did was they countered 16 and said, "Okay, here's how we can get you to 20 17 years. Guarantee ten at a minimum, and, at our 18 option, depending on the economics ten years from 19 now, cash flow, how much beach access we've been 20 able to develop elsewhere, we, the County will make 21 the decision as to whether or not we want to 22 postpone this in two more increments of five 23 years," and they could, so in the end, we could get 24 20 years, but the first five additional and the 25 second five additional are at their sole Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite eDrive an Alexander Gallo Company 0 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 50 1 discretion. Okay? 2 Over on page eight, sub eight, paragraph five, 3 it's just pretty simple, straightforward. If the 4 County fails to provide written of its intent to 5 either use the time extensions provided for in the 6 agreement or to resume development at the end of 7 the abatement period, the development order shall 8 be deemed null and void. This is the you know what 9 or get off the pot clause. They can't drag their 10 feet. They have to tell us what they're going to 11 do. 12 MR. SLINEY: This is the one I mentioned 13 before. The County, in my opinion, gave up a good 14 card because they -- Okay, let's say they don't 15 develop the property, they still own it. If they 16 want to make -- for every reason they don't want to 17 develop it for 20 years, they're going to make us 18 responsible for it and to either rezone it to 19 something they wanted or sell it or -- we're not 20 responsible for anything now. If they don't 21 develop it, not our fault, they still own it, it's 22 their problem. So that was the key thing that we 23 got out and they gave that up. 24 MR. SORRELLI: I like that. 25 MR. SUGERMAN: Okay. Continuing on page Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 51 u 1 eight, paragraph six, what this one says is that 2 once it's agreed to, the development order, 3 including the stipulated settlement agreement, will 4 remain in full force and effect throughout the 5 postponement period up to that full 20 years. 6 However, what the County asked for and we agreed to 7 is that the code under which they would develop a 8 park, should they choose to do so, will be the 9 current code, today's code, meaning they enjoy the 10 development order and it's measured against the 11 current code. In their minds that's protection 12 against a future commission coming back and just 13 going crazy with the code and almost, you know, 14 making them jump through all kinds of hoops. We u 15 are protecting them from what might happen in the 16 future by tying the current code provision to the 17 stipulated settlement agreement and the development 18 order. Okay? 19 MAYOR NEWELL: Any questions? 20 MR. SUGERMAN: The bottom of page eight, 21 paragraph seven, this just says that they are 22 allowed to place two signs on the property, one on 23 the west parcel and one on the east parcel, and 24 it's a -- those signs are depicted in an exhibit 25 which are attached to the agreement, and we've Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 52 1 actually already seen the signs and they're fairly 2 nondescript signs. 3 The top of page nine, paragraph eight, this is 4 the paragraph that says the County shall be 5 responsible for maintaining the subject property 6 including specifically the wall and any landscaping 7 placed on the west parcel during the abatement 8 period. So if they abate for 20 years, they're 9 responsible for maintaining the parcel for 20 10 years. 11 There's also a provision that within one year 12 of the effective date of the amended development 13 order, they shall clear and grub the west parcel, 14 they're going to remove the existing paving and 15 they're going to grade the perimeter landscape 16 buffers and the balance of the site as provided for 17 in an exhibit, and that's Exhibit D. They're also 18 going to seed the site with grass. We are not 19 asking them to install any permanent irrigation 20 system. 21 MS. TRINLEY: Doesn't that west property 22 contain a mangrove? 23 MR. SUGERMAN: It does. The west property on 24 the north end. 25 MS. TRINLEY: Right. Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 53 N%-101 1 MR. SUGERMAN: And it is part of the proposed 2 development. It's really a drainage basin and it's 3 supposed -- it will remain a natural area. 4 MS. TRINLEY: So they won't do anything do it? 5 MR. SUGERMAN: They will maintain it, which 6 means if there's native vegetation in there, 7 they'll maintain the native vegetation. If exotics 8 or weeds move into it, they will remove the exotics 9 and the weeds, but it will be maintained in its 10 natural state. 11 MS. TRINLEY: Shouldn't that be mentioned? 12 MR. SUGERMAN: Actually, it's on the site 13 plan, and I brought it with me in case anybody 14 wants to look at it, but, yes, that wetland area is u 15 marked on the site plan and it even says something 16 to the effect that it's -- whatever. Let me get it 17 and I'll answer your question directly. 18 When I left the room during Mr. Yacht's 19 presentation, I went back and got this because I 20 had a feeling this question might come up. 21 So, it's designated as wetland area. It's 22 called the Undisturbed Wetland Habitat, and so 23 they're responsible for maintaining it as an 24 undisturbed wetland habitat and there are standards 25 for that. Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 54 1 MS. TRINLEY: Thank you. 2 MR. BAIRD: This also dealt with your 3 conditions 24 and 25. In 24, they have to make a 4 request to the environmental agencies to remove the 5 exotics and to enhance the vegetat -- native 6 vegetation. And in your condition 25, they're 7 required to record a conservation easement which 8 will require that property to forever be maintained 9 as a conservation area. 10 MS. TRINLEY: Thank you. 11 MAYOR NEWELL: I don't know about the rest of 12 the Commission, but that -- 13 MR. PAGLIARO: Speak up. 14 MAYOR NEWELL: The site of that -- The 15 residents have always complained to me about the 16 ugliness of that northern end and how it looks like 17 a jungle and -- but I discussed it with the town 18 manager yesterday and he told me the same thing 19 he's telling you today. 20 MR. SUGERMAN: The balance of the stipulated 21 settlement agreement is really legal. I've covered 22 the administrative stuff, so if either of our 23 attorneys want to pick up on paragraph nine and go 24 over any of those, that's legal mumbo - jumbo. 25 MR. SLINEY: Are you all interested in, as the Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 55 u 1 town manager says, the legal mumbo - jumbo? I don't 2 know if that really effects you all substantively. 3 It's basically procedure. I don't know that -- 4 MR. SUGERMAN: The biggest issue might be each 5 side covers its own costs. 6 MR. SLINEY: Yeah. I don't know, Tom, do you 7 have an comments on whether there is anything of 8 interest to the Commission? 9 One thing is -- and I'm just -- number four on 10 ten, and I guess this is kind of a substantive 11 entity, procedural issue, is that -- 12 MR. SUGERMAN: That's 14 on ten. 13 MR. SLINEY: Yeah. Okay. 14 The parties agree that upon execution of the u 15 agreement, the County will have commenced 16 development, so they're protecting themselves by 17 the Town claiming that they never started 18 development, and I think that's probably fair. And 19 I don't know, Tom, do you have anything else? 20 MR. BAIRD: The only thing that's important -- 21 not the only thing but -- is paragraph nine on page 22 nine. The County's going to dismiss with prejudice 23 their remaining lawsuit, so -- 24 MR. SLINEY: And there's only one other thing, 25 and I'll go to page 12, and it's the very last item Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 56 1 there. It says, "Nothing in this settlement u 2 agreement entitles Palm Beach County to any 3 particular planning or zoning decision, and nothing 4 in this settlement agreement shall be construed to 5 delegate any of the Town of Highland Beach's 6 governmental authority to Palm Beach County, or 7 vise - versa." Other than that, I'm not sure there's 8 anything legal -wise that would be of interest to 9 you. 10 MR. SORRELLI: So what we have here: The 11 three of you agree this is a great settlement and 12 go for it. 13 MR. SLINEY: That's a fair statement. In 14 other words, like I've said several times before, 15 if you do a settlement agreement, nobody gets 16 everything they want, you know. I think based on, 17 you know, having been part of this whole thing for 18 years and years and years and hearing many public 19 hearings, I think the operative section is the 20 postponement. You know, like I say, it may never 21 get built. I think that's certainly from a town 22 policy standpoint, based on what we've heard for 23 years and years, that probably would be received 24 favorably by the Town's residents. 25 So, like I said, I've done a lot of settlement Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 57 u 1 agreements on a lot of issues, and so you look at 2 the whole -- Does the whole benefit you more than 3 it's a disadvantage to you? That's how I look at 4 it. 5 I think we can certainly go back. Tom has 6 been making a list of things that have been 7 concerns to you. I guess we could go back and have 8 Tom talk with Amy Petrick and see if, on the issues 9 that you've been most concerned about, if they're 10 agreeable to see -- to change those; if not, I 11 agree with Dale. I would go forward with it 12 because I think the environment is correct. If you 13 like the agreement, basically you like what the 14 agreement does, I'd push it forward. u 15 MAYOR NEWELL: Anything further? 16 MS. TRINLEY: Can Mr. Baird just recap what we 17 didn't agree on? 18 MR. BAIRD: The only item I have that you 19 didn't agree on, or at least there didn't appear to 20 be agreement on it, was at the bottom of page six, 21 paragraph two regarding the property line dispute. 22 It seemed that there were some heads nodding that 23 this should be held off until that dispute was 24 resolved, and our recommendation is that this 25 paragraph is acceptable. Aria Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive i Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 58 1 MR. SORRELLI: On the County. u 2 MR. SUGERMAN: No, from us. 3 MR. BAIRD: From us. 4 MR. SUGERMAN: Well, it's acceptable to the 5 County as well because they proposed it. 6 MR. BAIRD: But it's your decision. So if I'm 7 to go back and talk to the County about this 8 document, the one issue that, unless you tell me 9 otherwise, remains at issue is whether paragraph 10 two stays in this document or whether we wait to 11 execute the document until after they -- 12 MAYOR NEWELL: I don't think there's anybody 13 here that wants to wait until after. Our question 14 was, everything else prior to that had timeframes 15 on it, six months, nine months, a year, two years 16 or whatever, and the question came up can there be 17 a timeframe put on that before they built the fence 18 and landscaping? 19 MS. TRINLEY: I don't think there can be. 20 MR. BAIRD: And my response to that is that we 21 don't control the timeframe. 22 MS. TRINLEY: Right. 23 MR. BAIRD: The parties to that litigation 24 control the timeframe and a court or appellate 25 court controls that timeframe. We could put an Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 ae www.esquiresolutions.com an HEARING March 17, 2010 59 1 arbitrary timeframe on there and say, 2 "Notwithstanding the existence of the litigation, 3 you've got to do this in two years," but, you know, 4 either the County's going to accept that or they're 5 not going to accept it. 6 MR. SLINEY: Could I go over a couple of 7 procedural issues? Okay. Like, where do we go 8 from here? Okay. And Tom Baird can talk to this 9 more than I can about what the County wants to do 10 from his conversation with Amy Petrick. 11 Your purpose here today is to strategize and 12 try to make a determination of what you want us to 13 do next, okay? 14 Normally, Amy Petrick basically said that she 15 wanted to know what the general feeling was today 16 about the agreement because apparently she wants to 17 take that -- if there was a basic consensus, she 18 wants to take that to the Board of County 19 Commissioners and have them actually vote on it 20 first, and then they would want the Town to vote on 21 it after they had approved it. Is that correct, 22 Tom? 23 MR. BAIRD: Correct. 24 MR. SLINEY: And so, originally Dale had said 25 we could act on it on April the sixth, but Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 Suite 120 ESQUIRE 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 60 1 apparently the County doesn't want us to do that. 2 Is that correct, Tom? 3 MR. BAIRD: That's correct. 4 MR. SLINEY: Okay. So, today Tom can go back 5 I guess with one of two messages: One, the 6 agreement as a whole is acceptable to the County 7 and she should arrange to put that on an agenda for 8 the County to approve it; or, two, the agreement is 9 acceptable except for the part that Tom Baird just 10 read and that she would like -- that the Commission 11 would like her to go back to her clients and see if 12 we could get some other language. That's where I 13 see we are today. I don't know if anybody else has 14 any comment. 15 MR. SUGERMAN: I think you're right on. 16 MAYOR NEWELL: Well, I think four of the 17 commissioners agree that it's acceptable. I mean, 18 not to put words in your mouth, but that's the 19 impression I'm getting. 20 MR. SLINEY: So basically of the Commission, 21 we could go back and saying there's a consensus 22 that we would like to go forward with the agreement 23 and that the County should do what they want to do 24 procedurally and approval it and then advise us 25 that they have approved it and then we would Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite eDrive 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 61 u 1 schedule a public hearing for the Town to review it 2 and formally accept it in public. Is that kind of 3 the consensus? 4 MS. TRINLEY: Yes. 5 MS. ZWICK: Yes. 6 MR. SORRELLI: Yes. 7 MAYOR NEWELL: The only word that I would 8 change in there: "A majority of the Commission 9 have accepted it." 10 MR. SLINEY: Okay. However. Whatever. 11 Because we can't vote. You can't tell me -- you 12 can't raise your hand and say, "I'm in favor of 13 it," so we just can take the strategy back to -- 14 and probably Tom would do that. Is that fair? u 15 Anybody else got any comment on that as far as -- 16 did I say that correctly? 17 MR. BAIRD: Yes, you did. Mayor, if I may, 18 the last comment I would have on that is that if 19 the optimistic reports that we have heard about a 20 settlement between the County and Boca Highlands is 21 imminent, then it could well be before you actually 22 vote on this settlement agreement that that 23 paragraph will become moot. 24 MR. SLINEY: And I would say, unless anybody 25 else has any comments, I guess we could adjourn the Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com I I HEARING March 17, 2010 62 1 private session and then go into a public session u 2 and then basically you would adjourn that because 3 you have nothing to discuss in the public session. 4 MAYOR NEWELL: Well, we have the 5 administrative oath of office -- 6 MR. SLINEY: Well, I don't mean that -- 7 MAYOR NEWELL: And then we also have reports 8 of Town Commission -- 9 MR. SLINEY: I misspoke. 10 MAYOR NEWELL: -- and we have the public 11 reports. 12 MR. SLINEY: Right. What I meant was, on this 13 issue we have nothing to report. 14 MAYOR NEWELL: No. 15 MR. SLINEY: I didn't mean to slight 16 Commissioner Trinley. 17 MS. TRINLEY: You better not. 18 MAYOR NEWELL: Not only did you slight her, 19 you slighted us. 20 MS. TRINLEY: Now, will I remain in this seat 21 or do I go where (inaudible) -- 22 MR. SUGERMAN: You remain in that seat. 23 MAYOR NEWELL: The Town Clerk could call you 24 down there. 25 MS. TRINLEY: Which seat do I take? Is that Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite431 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com an HEARING March 17, 2010 63 1 right? 2 MAYOR NEWELL: And can I call a ten minute 3 recess? 4 MR. PAGLIARO: May I ask a question? 5 MAYOR NEWELL: No. Yes. Go ahead. You 6 forgot the question. 7 MR. PAGLIARO: No. I'm trying to think of how 8 I word this. Is there a consensus between the 9 three of you, and this is from what I was hearing 10 today. We all know that Mrs. Milani has been in 11 contact with each of us. 12 MAYOR NEWELL: She has not been in contact 13 with me. 14 MR. PAGLIARO: I'm not going to go there. 15 MAYOR NEWELL: She tried to contact me. 16 MR. PAGLIARO: Now, my point is this. I'm 17 just thinking in terms of -- I'm not going to get 18 into the heads of the County and speculate, but 19 they obviously have agreed here they will not go 20 this far (inaudible) down the road. Now, we all 21 know the County may have reason and there may be 22 reasons and I'm not going to try and speculate, but 23 do you have any sense, has Mrs. Milani, do you 24 know, has Mrs. Milani made any overtures to the 25 County at all? She's made overtures to us, which Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo Company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 64 u 1 she's talking to the wrong party because the County 2 is who she should be talking to. Do you have any 3 idea whether she's done that or not? 4 MR. SLINEY: I personally do not, no, what 5 she's been doing. 6 MAYOR NEWELL: In my opinion, we should not be 7 talking to Mrs. Milani. 8 MR. PAGLIARO: No, I agree with that. That's 9 not where I'm going. 10 MS. TRINLEY: Right now it's none of our 11 business. 12 MR. SLINEY: We can't control what she may do 13 if the County and the Town come to an agreement. 14 We have no control over that. 15 MR. PAGLIARO: No, I understand that. 16 MS. TRINLEY: She's not part of the equation 17 as we speak. 18 MAYOR NEWELL: And I think you just -- I don't 19 want to say deteriorate the situation. You make 20 the situation worse if we accept communication from 21 her and discuss the subject at all. I may be wrong 22 on that, but do the attorneys want to make a 23 comment on that? 24 MR. SLINEY: Well, I would say this. You're 25 under -- obviously whatever they want to file is a Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 ae www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 65 u 1 public record we're obligated to take, but we're 2 not obligated to respond as far as I'm concerned. 3 I mean, people make proposals to government bodies 4 all the time. If the government body is interested 5 in responding, it will respond. If you're not 6 interested in responding, you have no obligation 7 to. 8 MAYOR NEWELL: Okay. But we have one part of 9 the lawsuit that my understanding there's still 10 something open on that. As long as that something 11 is open, I don't think we should be communicating 12 with her. 13 MR. BAIRD: Mayor, I think you're on point 14 because you are on record as saying, by virtue of u 15 your approval of the development order, that what 16 is appropriate for that property is a park and a 17 park with 43 conditions. And until the County 18 decides to use that property differently, they are 19 authorized to use that park. So entertaining 20 offers by someone else to change the use of that 21 park for residential or whatever purposes seems to 22 me to be not appropriate until at least the 23 litigation is resolved. And if after the 24 resolution of the litigation the County reaches an 25 agreement with Ms. Milani to sell her the property Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 66 1 and she wants to come back and try to change the 2 zoning, that's her opportunity as a citizen. 3 MAYOR NEWELL: You know, meeting after meeting 4 after meeting we have said no to Joe Gott in 5 discussing what you said was indicated in 6 litigation, and so I don't see that we should be 7 treating her any differently than we treated him. 8 MR. SLINEY: I agree with what Tom said. 9 MR. SUGERMAN: And I think he said it 10 perfectly. You were right on point. 11 MR. SLINEY: If there's no comment, 12 procedurally here's what I think we should do. 13 Does anybody else want anything else to discuss? 14 Okay. Then I think there should be a motion 15 to adjourn the attorney- client private session, and 16 then after that, you would take a ten minute recess 17 and then you would come back to the public session. 18 MAYOR NEWELL: Do I have a motion saying so? 19 MS. ZWICK: So move. 20 MR. PAGLIARO: Second. 21 MAYOR NEWELL: All in favor say aye. 22 (A chorus of ayes.) 23 MAYOR NEWELL: Ayes carry. 24 (The hearing was concluded at 12:12 p.m.) 25 Toll Free: 800.330.6952 ` Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo company www.esquiresolutions.com HEARING March 17, 2010 67 1 C E R T I F I C A T E 2 3 STATE OF FLORIDA 4 COUNTY OF PALM BEACH 5 6 7 I, Beth Sklar, Professional Reporter, State of 8 Florida at large, certify that I was authorized to and 9 did stenographically report the foregoing proceedings 10 and that the transcript is a true and complete record of 11 my stenographic notes. 12 Dated this 4th day of April, 2010. 13 14 �./ A l 15 B a ofessional 'Rep 16 17 Job #152101 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Toll Free: 800.330.6952 Facsimile: 561.338.9294 ESQUIRE Suite 120 2385 NW Executive Center Drive Boca Raton, FL 33431 an Alexander Gallo company www.esquiresolutions.com