Loading...
1992.08.25_TC_Minutes_Specialz TOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH, FLORIDA • Minutes of Meeting of Town Commission SPECIAL MEETING Tuesday, August 25, 1992 10:00 a.m. Mayor Joseph A. Boulay called the Special Meeting of the Town Com- mission of the Town of Highland Beach, Florida, to order in the Commission Chambers at Town Hall at 10:00 a.m. Others present were Vice Mayor Bill Paul, Commissioners Arlin Voress, Arthur Eypel, and John F. Rand. Also in attendance were Town Attorney Thomas E. Sliney, Town Manager Mary Ann Mariano, Town Clerk Anne M. Kowals, and Attorney George Roberts of Roberts and Reynolds, P.A. Mayor Boulay noted this Special Meeting is in response to a memo- randum from Drexel Investments requesting a hearing regarding the August 11, 1992 proposal (a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes) submitted to the Town. Representing Drexel Properties were Attorney Brian Deuschle, Steve Mehallis, and Gordon Latz. Attorney Sliney, for the record, commented with regard to Mr. Mangurian's July 6, 1992 letter noting it was filled with many inaccuracies. Further, Attorney Sliney stated he found the letter very offensive as it demeaned both Attorneys Roberts and he. Commissioner Rand, alluding to Mr. Mangurian's letter cited above and reiterating the fact that it contained numerous inaccuracies, stated Mr. Mangurian's comments were out of order and the Commis- sioner personally considered it as an affront. Following Attorney Deuschle's detailed explanation of the propo- sal, it was the consensus of the Commission to have Town Manager Mariano work with Attorneys Sliney and Roberts to draft a counter- proposal which will be reviewed by the Commission Members prior to forwarding to Drexel Investment's Attorney Deuschle. Upon MOTION by COMMISSIONER VORESS/COMMISSIONER RAND, Mayor Boulay adjourned the Special Meeting at~1:20 a.m. , ~ APPROVED : _ ,C../ (}l . Jos h A. Boulay, Mayor Paul, Vice 1. Town Commission Special Meeting Minutes August 25, 1992 Page Two A li Voress Comm'ssioneT Arthur Eypel mmission ~' Rand, Commissi er A E to : ~., ,- i 4 Ci .2 / .~amk r'~ u y f._J LAW OFFICES DEUSCHLE & ASSOCIATES, P. A. BRIAN C. DEUSCHLE CHRISTOPHER D. HALE ILENE O. NAPP 888 SOUTHEAST THIRD AVENUE SUITE 300 FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33316 August 11, 1992 Mary Ann Mariano, Town Manager Town of Highland Beach 3614 South Ocean Boulevard Highland Beach, FL 33487 TELEPHONE (3051 763-7200 TELECOPIER 13051 522-7728 Re: (a) Dresel•Investments, Inc. v. Town of Highland Beach Case No. 85-4341 CA (L) F (the "Density Case") (b) Drezel Investments, Inc. v. Town of Highland Beach Case No CL 89-11700 AD {the "Civil Ri hts Case" Dear Ms. Mariano: Pursuant to the instructions of my client, you will find • enclosed an original and four copies of a Memorandum setting forth the elements of a proposed settlement of the captioned pending litigation. This Memorandum is sent to you with the view of settling a disputed matter and, accordingly, is privileged and shall not be used in evidence in any proceeding for any purpose. We are prepared to move forward to discuss proposed settlement at the meeting reserved for August 25, 1992, commencing at 10:00 a.m~~ S BCD:js Enclosures cc: Mr. Steve Mehallis (w/cc of enclosure) George P. Roberts, Jr., Esq. • (w/cc of enclosure) the terms of the that purpose on +-.1`J \~~,.. r~ u MEMORANDUM TO: Town of Highland Beach (the "Town") FROM: Drexel Investments, Inc., f/k/a Drexel Properties, Inc. ("Drexel") RE: Settlement of Pending Litigation DATE: August~ll, 1992 There is presently pending in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, the following litigation: Drexel Investments, Inc. v. Town of Highland Beach Case No. 85-4341 CA (L) F (the "Density Case") Drexel Investments, Inc. v. Town of Highland Beach Case No. CL 89-11700 AD (the "Civil Rights Case") The purpose of this Memorandum is to suggest a method of resolving all issues pending in both the Density Case and the Civil Rights Case, including the Counterclaim filed by the Town in connection with the Density Case. The terms and provisions of the of such resolution shall be set forth in a Settlement Stipulation (the "Settlement Stipulation") to be filed in each case; the principal elements of which are proposed as follows: 1. The Town will, by special ordinance, zone the lands identified in the Complaints (the "Property") so that the same will entertain a gross maximum density of 206 dwelling u Nits ,,_ ~,l~loc~te~ ~~ as follows: ~- ~(~,`t ~~..y~ = ~;. (a) Six (6) dwelling units on the Ocean parcel; (b) Two hundred (200) dwelling units on the Intracoastal Parcel. The ordinance shall also recognize that Drexel's right in and to the zoning is vested by virtue of previous expenditures in reliance thereon, namely, expenditures made in connection with the installation of the sewer trunk line to service the Property and other properties. ~` 1 ` JJaI~ 2. The Town agrees that upon execution of the Settlement Stipulation, it will pay to Drexel the sum of $50,000.00 to partially reimburse it for losses sustained as a result of the termination of the building permits it received from the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers and the State of Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. 3. The Town and Drexel shall, by separate written Agreement, in recordable form, cancel the following instruments previously executed between Drexel and the Town: a) Declaration of Unity of Title b) Maintenance Access Easement c) Parking and Access Easement d) Encroachment Agreement; whereupon the Town shall withdraw from and henceforth refrain from using any of its previous rights and privileges under such instruments. 4. The Town, in connection with the utilization of the zoning authorized pursuant to paragraph 1 above, shall afford Drexel the following rights and privileges which shall be appurtenant to the Property and which shall be enforceable not only by Drexel but by any of its successors in title: -'` ~ (a) The Town shall permanently reserve two hundred and six (206) sewer and water hookups in favor of the Property at no charge. '~~ (b) The Town shall provide building permits for the Property at no charge. %~•. ~ (c) The Town shall either pay or waive all impact fees otherwise charged in connection with the development of the Property. (d) The Town agrees to grant such variances as may be necessary to permit on-site drainage in connection with the development of the property or if off-site drainage is necessary, provide the same. (e) The Town agrees to grant such variances as may be necessary under any and all Town ordinances so as to authorize the issuance of building permits to the extent of the authorized density substantially based upon the geometrical configuration of the buildings, parking facilities, paved areas and pervious areas contemplated in the site plan attached to the previous Settlement Stipulation between the Town and Drexel, dated June 17, 1980, with the exception of the reduced density as herein set forth. • ~` 2 . - .. • 5. The Town shall authorize the issuance of building permits on Lots 76 and 77 East involving variances in the State Coastal Construction Control Line, provided that all appropriate State of Florida agencies have first consented thereto. 6. The Town shall authorize the issuance of building permits on the Intracoastal Parcel for dredging and filling and the construction of a marina, provided that Drexel has first obtained permits from the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation and from the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers. 7. The Town shall authorize the issuance of such permits as are necessary for the clearing of the property and the filling thereof to grade without the necessity of the submission of a formal site plan. 8. The Town shall execute a general release in favor of Drexel, save and except for the rights of the Town against Drexel as set forth in the Settlement Stipulation. 9. Drexel shall execute a general release in favor of the Town, save and except for the rights of Drexel against the Town as set forth in the Settlement Stipulation. 10. The Density Case shall be dismissed with prejudice, each side bearing and sustaining its own costs and attorneys' fees. 11. The Civil Rights Case shall be dismissed with prejudice, each side bearing and sustaining its own costs and attorneys' fees . [Town.mem] BCD:js 3