2012.07.31_TC_Minutes_WorkshopTOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH
MINUTES OF TOWN COMMISSION MEETING
WORKSHOP MEETING
Tuesday, 31, 2012 1:30 PM
Mayor Bernard Featherman called the Workshop Meeting to order in Commission Chambers at 1:30
PM.
CALL TO ORDER:
Roll Call: Members present: Mayor Bernard Featherman; Vice Mayor Ron Brown; Commissioner
Doris M. Trinley; Commissioner Dennis J. Sheridan; and Commissioner Louis P. Stern. Also present:
Town Attorney Len Rubin; Town Manager Kathleen Dailey Weiser; Town Clerk Beverly Brown;
Finance Director Cale Curtis; Public Works Director Jack Lee; Chief of Police Craig Hartmann;
Building Official Mike Desorcy; Assistant to the Manager Zoie Burgess; and members of the public.
Pledge of Allegiance: The Pledge of Allegiance was given, followed by a minute of silence.
Civility Pledge: The Civility Pledge was recited by the Town Clerk.
1. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS OR ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA
Mayor Featherman asked for any additions or deletions. Receiving none, the agenda was accepted
as presented.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND REQUESTS
Carl Feldman — 3210 S. Ocean Blvd.
I am a concerned citizen and taxpayer of Highland Beach. One year ago, Commissioner Sheridan
stated he was interested in saving money. Renovations of this side of the building cannot be authorized
as the Commission does not have the authority to spend that amount of money without a referendum.
The Town Commission cannot spend money that the Town does not have.
Anita Pearlman — 2352 S. Ocean Blvd.
The condos have been operating on a different tax basis than the houses. My taxes have gone up
$10,000 for the past two years. The houses adjacent tome have sold for half their value. The
condos do not have the same problems as the home owners.
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 2 of 18
Arlin Voress — 4403 Intracoastal Drive
Property values in Bel Lido have gone back up rapidly, but not at the value they were a few years
ago. It will be a while before they get back to the point. The Town Commission is looking at
expanding this part of the building.
Gloria Tanenbaum — Seagate
I have been a resident of Highland Beach for over twenty one years. Appreciate all the work the
Commission does, and would like to thank them.
Commissioner Trinley — Did the architect take into consideration in that $750,000 figure that this
building might not be hurricane proof? Town Manager Weiser — I cannot say for sure. This figure
comes out of his initial review. I would assume that he took that into consideration. But I cannot say
for sure. Comm. Trinley — I would like to have that answered.
Jack Tanenbaum — Seagate
While sitting here, I have looked around this room. Cannot see why at this particular time the need to
remodel and raise the taxes. There are a lot of people who live in the condo's that cannot afford to
have their taxes raised. At this time it is utterly foolish to spend the money.
Beverly Tra f — Ambassadors East
This building is beautiful, do not see the need to refurbish it. We have some beautiful houses and
villas here that pay more taxes than the condo's. I am in real estate and houses are selling at half
their original price. Our taxes are high enough. I cannot see any reason to raise the taxes.
Harold Hagelmann — 4748 S. Ocean Blvd. and former Mayor
I know that the Commission is looking for more money. You have to remember that we still own
two parcels of property in Boca. Have we had any interest on it? At one time we had an offer on
it, but the Commission rejected it. If we could sell the property, that would bring in additional
money. Mayor Featherman — The Financial Advisory Board has recommended that we sell the
property. Manager Weiser — That money is Water Enterprise money, and cannot be co -mingled
with the General Fund.
Jack Halpern — 4511 S. Ocean Blvd.
On Saturday and Sunday mornings, there is a large gaggle of bicyclists that drive through town.
For a while they stopped, but recently have started again. They constantly interfere with the
regular flow of traffic. We really need to stop them. Have noticed some of the towns in north
county pull a police car across the lane of traffic and stop them. Is there something that can be
done? Mayor Featherman — There are things that the police can do.
Gloria Tanenbaum — Seagate
This past Saturday, they had blocked the whole lane of traffic and no one could get around them.
This needs to be addressed. They are out of control.
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 3 of 18
3. PRESENTATIONS:
Town Manager Weiser on behalf of the Florida League of Cities and the John Scott Dailey Florida
Institute of Government, presented to Vice Mayor Brown and Commissioner Stern, "Certificate of
Completion" for the completion of the 2012 Institute for Elected Municipal Officials held June 22 —
24, 2012 in Tampa. This is an intensive course sponsored by the Florida League of Cities to assist
newly elected officials.
4. BOARDS AND COMMITTEES
A) Board Correspondence:
• None
B) Board Action Report:
• None
C) Board Vacancies:
• Board of Adjustment & Appeals — One Appointment
• Code Enforcement Board — One Appointment
Interview — Talent Bank Application
Jack Halpern — 4511 S. Ocean Blvd.
Jack Halpern — Has been a resident of Highland Beach for fifteen years. Has two
engineering degrees and previously owned his own environmental consulting business for
over 40 years. He still does some consulting work. Previously was a member of the Code
Enforcement Board. After attending a Code Enforcement Board meeting recently, realized
there are some issues that are not being addressed in Highland Beach.
Consensus was to appoint Jack Halpern to a 3-year term and schedule on the August 7tt`
Consent Agenda.
D) Monthly Board Meetings
• Town Commission Budget Workshop — August 7" — 4:30 PM
• Planning Board — August 8tn - Cancelled
• Beaches & Shores Advisory — August 14th - Cancelled
• Code Enforcement Board — August 15th - Cancelled
• Financial Advisory Board — August 20th — 9:30 AM
• Town Commission Special — July 17th — 1:30 PM
• Bd. of Adjustment & Appeals — August 21St - Cancelled
5. PROPOSED ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A) ORDINANCE NO. 12-002 0
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 4 of 18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH, FLORIDA AMENDING
CHAPTER 6, "BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES," OF THE TOWN CODE OF
ORDINANCES; AMENDING ARTICLE I, "IN GENERAL," BY AMENDING
SECTION 6-1, "DUNE WALKOVER STRUCTURES;" REPEALING ARTICLE II,
"CONTRACTORS," ARTICLE III, "BUILDING CODE," ARTICLE IV, "COASTAL
CONSTRUCTION CODE," ARTICLE VI, "PLUMBING," ARTICLE VII, "GAS,"
ARTICLE VIII, "MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS," ARTICLE IX, "ELECTRICAL
CODE," AND ARTICLE X, "SWIMMING POOL CODE," IN THEIR ENTIRETY
AND ADOPTING A NEW ARTICLE II, "TECHNICAL CODES;" AMENDING V,
"SEAWALLS, BULKHEADS, RETAINING WALLS," BY AMENDING SECTION 6-
1269 "PENALTIES," SECTION 6-127, "CONSTRUCTION," SECTION 6-128,
"APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR BULKHEADS, SEAWALLS, RETAINING WALLS;
REQUIRED NOTIFICATION OF ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS," SECTION 6-
129, "INSPECTION," AND SECTION 6-132, "ABATEMENT OF NUISANCES,
INJURIOUS OR DANGEROUS CONDITIONS;" ADOPTING ADMINISTRATIVE
AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ADOPTING A
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 720-A;
PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Town Clerk Brown read Ordinance No. 12-002 O, title only, into the record.
Town Manager Weiser: On December 1, 2006 the Town Commission adopted Ordinance No. 720 A —
Amending Chapter 6, Building and Structures of the Code of Ordinances of Highland Beach. Once the
ordinance was adopted, a companion ordinance amending and restating Chapter 6 in its entirety was to
be adopted. This was never done. Attorney Len Rubin, Building Official Michael Desorcy and Town
Clerk Brown have reviewed Chapter 6 in its entirety and this ordinance is the result of such review.
The Ordinance adopts Administrative Amendments of the 2010 Florida Building Code; adopts a
Property Maintenance Code; and repeals Ordinance 720A. The Ordinance also modifies or repeals
outdated and obsolete language and confirms certain provision to current Town practices. A separate
Resolution adopting the fee schedule will be introduced at the August 28, 2012 Workshop Meeting.
Any item that is temporary in nature should be adopted by Resolution rather than Ordinance. The
current fee schedule being used by the Highland Beach Building Department was part of Ordinance
No. 720A and has never been restated.
No discussion. Consensus was to schedule on August 7, 2012 Agenda for First Reading.
B) RESOLUTION NO. 12-002 R
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF HIGHLAND
BEACH, FLORIDA, STRONGLY SUPPORTING THE COUNTY'S CONTINUED
ALLOCATION OF THE $12.50 FUNDS TO THE MUNICIPALITIES PURSUANT TO
COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. R-2002-0192, WHICH SERVES TO ENHANCE THE
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 5 of 18
COUNTY'S INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS PLAN; AND
STRONGLY SUPPORTING THE COUNTY'S DISBURSEMENT OF THE $12.50
FUNDS TO COVER EXPENSES FOR ALL MUNICIPALITIES THAT HAVE RADIO
SYSTEMS THAT ARE FUNCTIONALLY INTEROPERABLE WITH THE
COUNTY'S RADIO SYSTEM WITHOUT ARBITRARY DISTINCTIONS BEING
MADE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
Town Clerk Brown read Resolution No. 12-002 R, title only, into the record.
Town Manager Weiser stated Florida Statutes authorized Palm beach County to receive $12.50 from
each moving traffic violation written by municipal law enforcement officers in order to fund the
municipalities county's participation in an intergovernmental radio communication program. We
have learned that the County Staff intends to recommend to the County Commission termination of
all future disbursements. This Resolution is in support of the continuance of this allocation.
No discussion. Consensus was to schedule on August 7, 2012 Agenda for First Reading
6. NEW BUSINESS
A) Authorizing the Mayor to execute a Contract for Auditing Services with Nowlen, Holt &
Miner, P.A.
Town Manager Weiser - In September 2007, Nowlen, Holt & Miner, P.A. (NHM) was selected as the
most qualified accounting firm to audit the Town's financial statements. The audit engagement with
NHM expired with the completion of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 audit. Based on the
Town's positive experience and a negotiated 14% fee decrease with NHM, I would like to recommend
a renewal of the engagement for an additional three years (Fiscal Year Ends 2012, 2013, 2014). NHM
was able to provide a discounted renewal rate because they are already familiar with the Town's
methods of financial related activities and do not have to spend valuable time learning about the
Town's accounting policies, procedures, and internal controls. The engagement letter was reviewed
and determined to be legally sufficient by the Town attorney's office. The attached contract has been
drafted for execution of the engagement.
Comm. Trinlev — If we went out to Bid, would we lose that 14% fee decrease? Reply — Yes.
Consensus was to schedule authorization on the August 7`h Consent Agenda.
B) Charter Review Board Recommendations.
Town Attorney Torcivia — As some of you are aware from attending some of the meetings of the
Charter Review Board you had an excellent citizen board that you put together, Chaired by Mr. Clark
who is in the back. They went through the Charter paragraph by paragraph, section by section and I
will go through the proposed changes. I will just note that there are two categories of changes. Some
items have to go to referendum and some items can be approved by the Commission by ordinance so
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 6 of 18
that is set forth in the margins which way it has to go. Hopefully we will get some direction today as
to which ones you will want to approve; all of them, some of them, modify them and then we will
create the two ordinances one for a referendum and one to come back to you both for next week.
The first real change would be the third page in Section 1.05 and there are no changes on the first two
pages. This is pretty basic. There is really a typo where it talks about, in the second paragraph, the
Town of Highland Beach may, it is supposed to be sue or be sued, so instead of the word sue it was a
typo and used the word use instead of sue so there is a change there. The line under that is in
accordance with law in Section 9.03 of this Charter. However this is one of the ones that has to go to
referendum and there is a whole body of case law when one has to go to referendum. Essentially there
are nine items that have to go to referendum plus anything that went to referendum in the past so if
ever was approved by referendum it has to go back to referendum. But if it was not approved by
referendum it could be approved by ordinance. Again in the margins it will tell you this was amended
by referendum so it has got to go back to referendum, if you want to make that change.
The next page is 1.06. Let's start with the terms of office of Commissioners and in section three the
suggestion of the committee is that no person may serve more than two successive elected full terms
and whether that is the Mayor or Commissioner and the conversations that the committee had were
what if someone is appointed to serve six months of a term, does that mean they can be elected only
once more or twice more. So it really was to clarify that this limit is to full terms that they were
elected to as opposed to filling in. Mayor Featherman — I know we had a Commissioner who served
less than a second term and according to the way we had it before that was considered a second term.
Attorney Torcivia - I think that is what the committee was trying to make it clear that if you are
elected you get a full term and you can get another elected full term. That is the committee
recommendation. Paragraph four on that same page says that the Commission shall designate by
Resolution we changed the word same to a qualified person as Town Clerk and once employed the
Town Clerk reports to the Manager in accordance with the Charter and the Town's Personnel Rules
and Regulations so the addition of the words Personnel Rules and Regulations and this is one that can
be amended by ordinance. Number five — The biggest change here was talking about the precincts and
they used to be precincts numbers 4094, 4086. At the first meeting there was another precinct
mentioned; by the second meeting they said the Supervisor of Elections was thinking of another
precinct to add so the suggestion was precincts may be established from time to time by the
Supervisors of Elections and just delete the numbers because the numbers are going to keep changing.
On the next change that was really just how the election is certified. Again, the Supervisor of Election
locally, I think the Clerks in general not just our Clerk but Municipal Clerks, have some frustration
with the current supervisor because she changes the rules as to how she is going to certify elections so
we just made it clear that it is the Commission that certifies the results. The Supervisor tabulates the
results; she brings the results forward; she says Commissioner Smith got 100 votes, Commissioner
Jones got 90 votes but you certify it as opposed to her coming to every municipalities meeting and
certifying them. That is what this change is all about and once you get the results you are the official
body that does the certification.
On 1.07 towards the bottom the word shall was changed to should. What they used to say was "The
Town Commission shall hold at least one meeting a month" and the suggestion was "should hold"
because particularly in the summer you might skip a month and sometimes there is no business. Right
now you are required to so the suggestion is should. There is nothing on the next page that starts
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 7 of 18
municipal powers. The page after that at the very top "land clearance" which talks about having
owners of land in the town keep them free of weeds and obnoxious growth they added the word
over rowth to that as a suggestion. Middle of the page # I 1 Cable & Telecommunications — we added
a couple of things to the extent permitted by law because the Federal Government enacted a law about
six years ago where they pretty highly regulate this whole communications field but if there little bits
left for the towns and municipalities who wanted to preserve that right we just put "to the extent
permitted by law you could do things" and we took out the words "beyond the boundaries". Frankly I
don't know how that ever got in there because no town has the power to do something beyond their
boundaries. Next page there is nothing. The page after that is Article No. 25 Littering Prohibited
Section 2.01 - Numeration of Powers. The Committee recommended adding prohibiting littering upon
any public or private beach within the town. Next page there is nothing. The page after that is Article
No. 25 Littering Prohibited Section 2.01 - Numeration of Powers. The Committee recommended
adding prohibiting littering upon any public or private beach within the town.
On the next page and there was a lot of discussion about this Paragraph 30 the Funding Limitation.
The language that is in the Charter now, and again this was added by ordinance and not by referendum
so this is something that can be done by ordinance. Any single project or accumulation of projects
over $350,000 the way it currently exists has to go to referendum. The committee spent two meetings,
an hour at each meeting, on this topic and their recommendation is any single project that exceeds
seven percent of the Town's General Fund Budget and I think from Cale and Kathleen that's about
$700,000 because right now your budget is about ten million so seven percent would be $700,000; if it
goes beyond seven percent it requires a vote of four Commissioners instead of three. Mayor
Featherman — That isn't how I read it. Attorney Torcivia — (Reading) Any single project requiring
allocation of more than seven percent of the Town's General Fund Budget in any fiscal year must first
be approved by the affirmative of four members of the Town Commission. Mayor Featherman — You
had said three. Attorney Torcivia — I'm sorry I meant to say four. I apologize.
Mayor Featherman — I have a comment on that however. I attended that meeting and I was surprised
and saddened that the way the amount was put in. It was changed from $350,000 to where it would
come out to about $750,000 and oddly enough we are working on a project of $750,000. Now I don't
think one has anything to do with the other but it comes to me as a surprise and really I think people
would think the same way. A single project with an allocation of seven percent on the project that we
looked at there were questions in my mind because we met on a Friday with the Architect and the next
Tuesday they voted to get prices on it and there were questions I had that I brought up and questions in
my mind as to what was involved in this. When they said $750,000 and he had approximately $75,000
additional I gave that deep concern because they want to put TV cameras in here, electrical work, want
to change the whole room around, they wouldn't have as many people sitting here, we have to pay for
chairs and when I started to think about it we have a nice place here. We don't need to put that in right
now. The economy is bad. It's terrible and our housing has gone down. When I heard those remarks
from people here today housing has gone down thirty to fifty percent in value and yes it will come
back. Everything comes back, just like the great depression came back ten years later. If they did
research on it, that's what they would see. I really feel I take exception to this seven percent because it
should go out where people would have a referendum instead of just having a Commissioner's vote on
it. I know we have good Commissioners here well-intentioned but sometimes when I look around the
room we only have eight to ten people here and they are mostly the same people and some of them
have a bias that is completely different than the will of the people out there who are our residents and
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 8 of 18
that's why I think we should have a referendum and that's why I think that figure should be a dollar
amount and not a percentage and it should go if maximum to $500,000 because it's just a figure. It
should go to a referendum and I really feel that there are concerns because I've gone through building
and just recently in '09 we put up a 70,000 foot building in Connecticut and we figured four million
dollars and it came out that when our costs were done it came close to five million dollars. It was
twenty to twenty-five percent more. And, here it is thought ten percent and we haven't figured
everything into it yet. We have a good Police Dept. but when I start to look at the things on the layout
they gave they have two conference rooms and I want to tell you something. I've researched this and
the Police work this way; they have two days on and three days off. They work six people in a full 24
hour shift. That means that they have the Chief and the Lieutenant and an Administrative Assistant, a
woman who works in the front room. Where are all these people going to be? We have separate
offices made. It's a Taj Mahal in my mind and what are we doing it for right now? We owe it to our
people to give them the best facilities but this is a bad, bad time to put money out. I can't see where
we are doing this if it were a question that we weren't going to look even for a double dip recession
which they are talking about now. We need to cut our spending instead of increasing our spending and
I think the people out there have a right to vote on this.
Vice Mayor Brown - First off we are not debating the projects what we are doing is going through our
Charter. We can debate whether or not it is smart to change this building when we get to that point in
our budget discussion. This is trying to take a Charter and look downstream and I think that anything
less than ten percent in the General Budget is very shortsighted. This Charter was made ten years ago.
This Charter that we just reviewed here is looking out for the next ten years and I think it is very
shortsighted ten years from now to tie the Commission to a fixed figure, i.e. your suggested $500,000.
We need to have an open mind and be able to look downstream and say that the Commission that is
sitting here ten years from now (2022) is not tied in funding and we have to go out every time we have
a project that is greater than $500,000. My recommendation is that we make a ten percent of the
General Fund Operating Budget as our maximum and if we go above ten percent then we go to
referendum. We get rid of all this verbiage of super majorities, unanimous vote and we make it a
figure and that figure I am recommending is that it would read something to the point of any single
ro'ect requiring an allocation of less than ten percent of the Town's General Fund Budget in any
given fiscal year shall not be funded until the purposes and amounts of such allocation shall have been
approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the Town Commission.
Mayor Featherman — I would like to, if I may, take challenge to that for reason. Nothing really holds
for ten years. When you plan you really work a three or a five year plan because things change
radically. We are going through very difficult times today. These are tough economic times. I just
have done some research since you have too. In 2010 we had six million three hundred thousand
dollars in our reserve fund. In 2011 we had approximately five million five hundred thousand. From
what I understand we took out about eight hundred thousand and put back about five hundred
thousand and that was told to me by one of our personnel. In 2012 we have approximately 4.75
million dollars right now 4.75 million dollars. The Government Finance Officers Association
recommends in '08 between five to fifteen percent and then they came back and said approximately
seventeen percent of your operating money should be put in that type of a fund a reserve fund. If you
figure seventeen percent that fund would come down to somewhere around two million four hundred
fifty thousand. Now if we continue in the direction going for the next three years, in 2013 it should be
about four million dollars in a reserve fund if we're tapping that and not raising our taxes. In 2014 it
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 9 of 18
should come down to 3.25 million dollars and 2015 she should come down to 2.4 million dollars.
Now this is what was stated by the Government Finance Officers Association. We are using
approximately seven fifty to eight hundred thousand dollars as a draw out of our Reserve Fund. We
need that Reserve Fund because if something hits in the next hurricane or a double dip recession where
are we going to get the money to help out here so we do have that Reserve Fund available.
Vice Mayor Brown — Sir could we come back to the point in question? The point in question is not
what our reserves are; point in question is not what our budget is going to be. The point in question is
what is the funding limitation for the Charter going to be?
Mayor Featherman - The funding should be we shouldn't spend more than we have and we shouldn't
spend money. We should cut our expenditures right now and we should have it set so this doesn't
dovetail with a thing we have working now with seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars. When I
look at it, if this says seven percent or seven and one half percent, that matches seven hundred fifty
thousand dollars on a project here. We really don't need to take that move right now.
Commissioner Stern — Mr. Mayor you are off point right now. You are totally one hundred percent off
point. Mayor Featherman — Tell me where I am off point. Commissioner Stem — Because, that is not
what we are discussing right now. This is not a budget discussion. This is not a discussion for
construction. Mayor Featherman — What I am bringing out is that we have a number of projects.
Commissioner Stern — All we are setting out is a Charter where the Commission can function
within... period. That is what we are here for today. So I think you are off point today. You may
bring all this up at a budget meeting and we've got them coming and we've got hearings coming. But
I think you are off point today. Mayor Featherman — Well thank you Mr. Commissioner.
Vice Mayor Brown — I think we need to go back to what we are discussing here and what our Attorney
brought up and that point is what and how we are going to set our funding limitation. It has nothing to
do with the budget; it has nothing to do with this building; it has nothing to do with that. It has to do
with a vision looking out to ten years from now as to how a Commission of Highland Beach is going
to be able to fund their projects without going to a referendum every time we go around and I think we
need to consider ten percent of the operating budget voted on by the majority of the Commission to be
able to fund our projects.
Mayor Featherman — I think that should be reduced considerably even though we are looking ahead
for ten years that puts us in a position where there is a conflict right now in my mind of something that
we are doing immediately. Vice Mayor Brown — That should have no bearing at all in what we are
doing. Mayor Featherman — It does have a bearing... Vice Mayor Brown — Well it doesn't. Mayor
Featherman — For a business person who understands it does have a bearing that you can't spend more
money than you have and you got to get approval from the people out there. We have to have a
referendum and the referendum should be a fair number not seven percent. We had before three
hundred and fifty thousand; alright so we move it to a half million dollars but to move it to a
percentage point we will be dropping down again. Commissioner Stern -That is only the
recommendation of those people that put together the recommendation to bring to us, and they worked
hard, and I accept what they tried to do for us. We don't have to accept what they did but I think what
they tried to do was fair and I think it makes sense. Now, we today, don't have to accept it. We are
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 10 of 18
only working on the Charter today. So let's use our heads and come to a decision that the five of us
can live with what's good for us and what's good for the Town.
Mayor Featherman — They did a good job on the Charter. Commissioner Stern — They did an
outstanding job. Mayor Featherman - Some things questioned in my mind because they dovetailed
together on this taking place. Commissioner Stern — I don't think it has anything to do with the project
or even thought about it. It has nothing to do with it because even at seven hundred and fifty thousand
dollars that is not enough money to do the project.
Commissioner Triple v — Since the Town is literally built out, give me an example what kind of
projects you have that might take all of this money. You know just what might happen. Vice Mayor
Brown — Well someday somebody might actually want to get something approved for cleaning the
beach. Commissioner Trinlev — The beach is private. How are you going to do that? Vice Mayor
Brown — No it's not. Commissioner Triple v - Yes at the high water mark it is. Mayor Featherman —
That is true it is private. Vice Mayor Brown — Okay I will give you another example. Someday we
may actually redo our walk way. Someday we may have to redo the roads. Someday we may have to
redo some of our infrastructure that we have that is starting to need repair. If we have to go out every
single time we have a project of five hundred thousand or more to a referendum, it reduces the
capability of the Commission to project and keep our infrastructure in our Town in the shape it is
today. Commissioner Trinlev — Okay, I appreciate everything you said and it all makes good sense but
it is a what if situation and given the reputation that most politicians have considering this is
summertime and most of the people aren't here I don't think it is very wise for us to consider this kind
of jump in what we are allowed to spend because I think it is unfair of the people not to have a say and
I agree with the Mayor.
Vice Mayor Brown - I am not trying to change it for today. This is going to be for the next ten years
and it just so happens to be today that we are talking about it. It has nothing to do with the current
project we are running.
Mayor Featherman — Why don't we keep it at three hundred and fifty thousand dollars and let people
do a referendum no matter what time it is. Vice Mayor Brown — So then every time we have a project
we have to wait until an election time frame to be able to proceed even to tell the Town Manager to get
a contract because we have to go to referendum. I disagree one hundred percent. Mayor Featherman
— I think you have to get this back to the people rather than just have five of us up here making a
decision. If the people want it and we decide we want to put it out there then they should have the
right to either take it or reject it. Vice Mayor Brown — Take what? What are we taking or rejecting?
Mayor Featherman — I am sorry we are getting now into a personal conflict. Vice Mayor Brown — No,
No, No I am talking about the funding limitation I am not talking about .... Mayor Featherman — Okay
fine.
Commissioner Trinlev — Okay since this is a workshop and we can't do anything about it I would just
like to go on record to say I don't approve of the way this is written. I don't know how it should be
but I don't approve of it.
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 11 of 18
Vice Mayor Brown — Then why don't we come up with a recommendation on how to write it because
that's what he wants us to do. The longer we delay it, the longer it will take to get it approved and on
the books.
Mayor Featherman — I think we have to go according to what we are talking about with the lawyer
right now but we have to express our views. I accept and respect what you say even if you would be
wrong and the same with you Lou because I believe you are doing it in an ethical and honorable way
and I say this, we should not change things that much. If it is working and it doesn't need to be fixed
let's not check it and if you look ahead ten years I don't know what's going to happen in ten years.
Commissioner Stern — I don't need to look ahead ten years, Sir. We do need a new fire engine at eight
hundred thousand dollars and we don't have one.
Commissioner Sheridan — And we do need two repairs in Bel Lido that each one is five hundred
thousand dollars on their water system, their pipes.
Mayor Featherman — Well, that would be in your area Vice Mayor Brown. Vice Mayor Brown — Well
that's in the Town of Highland Beach, Sir. I disagree with yours respectfully, not you and I am not
arguing against you, I am arguing against your principle of saying five hundred thousand. So I think
we need to come back and come up with some wording. Mayor Featherman — I have to go with
Commissioner Trinley and put it on hold until we come to a better understanding on this.
Commissioner Trinley — Also, I would like to remind you that the three hundred and fifty thousand
dollars was put in the form of an ordinance in 1993.
Vice Mayor Brown — I think we need to resolve this. I think we need to come up with some wording
that is acceptable to the majority of the Commission, not just you Mayor.
Mayor Featherman — Okay I make a motion that on Capital Expenditures .... Vice Mayor Brown — We
can't make a motion this is a workshop. Mayor Featherman — Okay over one hundred thousand
dollars it goes to referendum if you want something. Vice Maw Brown — You can't make a motion.
Vice Mayor Brown — I would like to try to get some wording together with the Town Attorney that is
agreeable to the majority of the Commissioners.
Commissioner Trinley — Okay I have another quick question. Can anybody tell me what the vote was
with the Charter Review members? Was it a solid everyone voting for this or was it broken down in
some way?
Vice Mayor Brown — The Town Attorney was at the meetings. He could answer that.
Town Attorney Torcivia — I don't have my notes from that meeting but it is my recollection that there
was discussion about seven percent; there was discussion about eight percent; there was discussion
about unanimous Commission approval, for super majority Commission approval and ultimately this
is what they recommended. This is kind of a compromise. Commissioner Trinley — I am asking what
the vote was. Town Attorney Torcivia — I don't remember if it was 510. Town Clerk Brown — I think
it was 3/2. Town Attorney Torcivia — I don't remember what the vote was. I know there was a lot of
discussion back and forth and this was a compromise.
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 12 of 18
Ron Clark — Good afternoon. I was Chair of this Committee. First of all you all appointed people
who spent a lot of time looking at this. There was a lot of discussion in regards to this. The purpose
of this, in all due respects Mr. Mayor, had nothing to do with any immediate projects that are out there.
The seven percent was a compromise. This went from all the way to where remove this language
altogether so that there is no referendum unless this Board of Commissioners votes to have something
to go to referendum. This is the only community around here who has any language regarding
spending at referendum whatsoever. You go up and down this coast this language does not exist.
There is not a $350,000 limitation. There is not a $500,000 limitation. There is not a percentage
limitation. So, there was a lot of effort looking at this from this group in this committee that was put
together to study this item. A percentage was decided upon. A percentage was decided upon because
it can be a moving target and does not lock somebody into a number ten years from now that would be
locked in today, such as you are stuck with the $350,000 that was applied ten years ago. Consensus
was with everybody at a 5/0 vote to come up with a percentage. Again we went from proposals of
one to a ten percent proposal to a five percent proposal. We did agree and ended up at a seven percent,
and the way the language was written, providing the Commission to have super majority powers to
vote for things over and above before they get to referendum. This compromise, and it was a
compromise, did end up with a 3/2 vote under the compromise. It is not because a 3/2 vote
compromise and I don't want you to take it the wrong way. There were people who wanted more.
The people under the two wanted more so this is a compromise to get to a certain level. The
percentage is something the Committee was adamant about. Maintaining a percentage in a workable
number was something the Committee was adamant about. Again, keep in mind this is the only
community that has this limitation of referendum whatsoever. So, does that answer your question?
Commissioner Trinley — Thank you Mr. Clark.
Mayor Featherman — Will the lawyer please proceed with the other pages? Town Attorney Torcivia -
At this point, and just in terms of next week's meeting, I am not sensing a consensus. Do I bring back
anything on this section at all or nothing at all? Mayor Featherman — I don't like the idea of having a
percentage. I would like to have a dollar amount in there. Vice Mayor Brown — We can vote on that
next week. We can't vote on that this week. This is not approved by the Commission so I would
move this to have a discussion next week so we could make some motions and get some votes on the
wording for No. 30 under Funding Limitations.
Town Attorney Torcivia — If it is okay with you Mr. Mayor and Commissioners, since we are going to
be preparing two different ordinances, we will include this in there. You could always modify it or
take it out as opposed to not having it in there at all. You can always tweak it next week when you are
voting. You will have something to consider otherwise there is nothing on the table to consider. So if
you want to have it on the table I will go with the Committee's language if that's okay and next week
you can debate it and decide where you want to go with it. Commissioners and Mayor agreed.
On the next page, Departments of the Town, the Committee recommended taking out that last sentence
that said "each of the Commissioners shall have a special air of interest as designated or assigned by
the Mayor and be available as an advisory role". I think the thought was that each of you is involved
in all aspects of the Town and rather than saying one Commissioner is only involved in a certain
aspect.
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 13 of 18
The next one was the deletion of 3.04 because I think the Committee felt that there really is no reason
to talk about suitable people performing these special extra duties. Now you have a professional staff
and think this is a holdover from the days where Commissioners were more active in the day to day
running of the Town.
The next page, Article Four, this is suspensions and discharge of personnel and police powers. This
area probably had the second most discussion after the funding limit we just talked about. The Town
Manager has the authority and it was specified, to hire, evaluate and discipline in addition to
suspending and discharging any employee of the Town. But then there are two exceptions, hiring or
discharging of the Police Chief or the Town Clerk in accordance with the personnel rules. So if there
is a vacancy for example in the position of Town Clerk, the Town Manager shall present to the
Commission a rank list of up to five applicants for the position and the Town Commission retains the
power to hire or discharge the Chief of Police and the Town Clerk either on its own initiative or to
approve the recommendation of the Town Manager. Commissioner Trinlev — Will the Town's Rules
and Regulations have to be changed to include that language about the Clerk? Town Attorney
Torcivia — Depending on what you are doing here, we are in the midst of working on the personnel
rules, and so depending on the direction you go here those rules will obviously reflect the Charter. So
whichever way the Charter goes the rules will follow. Mayor Featherman — So in other words will
those rules be changed? Attorney Torcivia — The rules we are working with the Town staff and we
intend to be presenting to you, probably within the next thirty days, hopefully the next workshop,
"proposed personnel rules". A lot of them are antiquated, some of them need to be updated and this is
obviously just one small part of many pages of rules but we can't finalize the rules until we know
which direction you are going on the Charter. These rules have to track your Charter.
The next paragraph just deals in terms of the Mayor designated a current employee to act as interim
Manager. If the Mayor were to suspend the Town Manager, until the next regular Council meeting or
special meeting is called, it used to say "that the Mayor will designate the Town Clerk as the
Manager". Now it simply says "the Mayor shall designate a current employee of the Town to act as
interim Manager." It could be the Clerk. Commissioner Trinlev — Why, what was the reason for that
change? Because it seems like having replacement in place is more to the benefit of the Town then
waiting for someone to name someone. Attorney Torcivia — The Committee felt that the Mayor
should have the discretion to pick the appropriate employee to serve as interim Town Manager. It
might be the Town Clerk, the Police Chief, Public Works Director or it could be any employee. This
is only an interim until the next meeting regular or a special meeting of the Town Council.
Commissioner Trinlev — Okay I don't agree with that one either. Mayor Featherman — The only
question I have is why it said "a current employee" instead of like we got our current Town Manager
to come in on an interim basis. Why was that then a current employee within Highland Beach?
Attorney Torcivia — I am not sure the reasoning of the Committee. Commissioner Stern — A timing
factor. Attorney Torcivia — Exactly, this is only interim. For example; if the Mayor decides you are
going to suspend the Town Manager and the next Town Commission meeting is two weeks away, for
those two weeks, someone has got to be the interim Manager. It used to be that is was automatically
the Town Clerk. Commissioner Trinlev — That would think to segue that business is taking care of as
usual. There is someone already in place. Attorney Torcivia — That is the purpose of the consensus
today. Commissioner Stern — It is only a suggestion to us Doris. We don't have to accept it.
Commissioner Trinlev — It doesn't make good business sense to me.
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31 2012 Page 14 of 18
Attorney Torcivia — The next page is kind of a continuation of what we just talked about with the
Town Manager, the hiring, termination. This one deals specifically with the Police Chief. You
remember the last one talked about up to five applicants for the Clerk. This one says the same thing
for the Police Chief. The Town Manager will present a rank list of up to five qualified applicants for
the position to the Commission. The Commission retains the power to terminate the employ of the
Chief as long as you give proper notice to the Chief and it also talks about the Chief allowing to
present evidence regarding his termination. Mayor Featherman — What is the present arrangement?
Attorney Torcivia — Presently, the Chief of Police is subject to evaluation and discipline by the Town
Manager but the termination and the hiring rest with the Commission. Town Manager Weiser — I
think I was talking to the Chief about it this morning. They presented that the Town Manager
presented the candidates to the Commission. They chose to do interviews too at the time our Chief
was hired.
Attorney Torcivia — No changes on the next page or the page after that. So the next page is 7.03 which
is the Millage Limit. Currently the Town has a five mill cap. The State Law is ten mills for any
Municipality but Highland Beach self -regulated and imposed a five mill cap. The Committee is
recommending changing that to 7-1/2 mills. Vice Mayor Brown — Why don't we look at inserting by
Florida Statute instead of requiring something different? Attorney Torcivia — In other words put ten
mills. Vice Mayor Brown — No don't put ten mills just by Florida Statute. Then if Florida Statute
changes we abide by what the Florida Statute is not by self -imposing something other than what the
Florida Statute says. Mayor Featherman — Now that is ten mills right now. Is that correct? Vice
Mayor Brown — It is right now. Mayor Featherman — If people understand it, then it is considerably
more towards raising taxes if that millage goes in. Which, I am against by the way. Attorney Torcivia
— Is there a consensus to simply say in accordance with Florida Statute? Commissioner Sheridan — I
agree. Attorney Torcivia — So really the easiest way, frankly to do this, is to strike that whole section
out because if there is no limitation mentioned then you automatically revert to Florida State Law.
That is my first thought but I will study it a little more when I get back to the office and we can just
strike that whole 7.03. Vice Mayor Brown — Yes I think you need to look at it close because this gives
you leeway of the Bonds and all that not being included in there. Attorney Torcivia — That is why I
want to look at it because I think the State Law covers all that but I will look at it and come up with
the right language by the next week.
The next page 9.03 — That's only dealing with lawsuits against the Town. This Charter actually did
not comply with State Law because it said the only kind of suit against the Town can be under the
76828 and there is a whole host of laws dealing with how towns can get sued so we just inserted the
words "other applicable law". And that was it.
7. MISCELLANEOUS — ITEMS LEFT OVER
A) Minutes
June 26, 2012 — Workshop Meeting.
June 26, 2012 - Special Meeting
July 17, 2012 — Special Budget Meeting
Mayor Featherman stated that he had requested that a statement be read on his behalf at the July 17th
Special meeting. Would like his comments read into the record: "I am so sorry that I cannot be with
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 15 of 18
you today, for this special meeting. Unfortunately, before this was arranged, I had scheduled an
important family even, in the northeastern part of the country. The meeting today is to consider setting
a tentative millage rate for our town. I understand the need to be flexible in setting this rate, so that we
can manage our budget process effectively. We can always lower the rate you agree on today, but
cannot later raise it without notifying each tax payer via first class mail. Nonetheless, I urge my
fellow commissioners to exercise caution at this difficult time in our economy. Many retired residents
of our community are feeling the pinch of reduced interest rates and dividends, and many of our
working residents are experiencing belt tightening in their business and professional lives. This is a
time for us all to be as frugal as possible with our taxpayer's dollars. We can always raise our rates, if
necessary, when the economy improves. Think about what you would like our federal government to
be doing right now. We should act the same way we would want the federal government to act on its
budget. Thank you for your attention to my concerns. I wish my fellow commissioners well, as you
deal with a difficult problem.
Consensus was to include the minutes on the next Regular Meeting Consent Agenda.
8. REPORTS — TOWN COMMISSION
A) Commissioner Stern — I do have two things I would like to mention today. Each of the
Commissioners including the Mayor received a memorandum, a letter, from our current Library
Director Maria Suarez. I would like to respond to the letter she sent to us. It seems Ms. Suarez
received a reprimand from our Town Manager Kathleen Weiser for which she was not very happy.
Her letter to the Commission was to ask for relief of the reprimand but according to our Town
Charter which we just went over again (4.01) the Town Manager has general supervision over all
affairs and employees with the exception of the Police Chief and the Town Clerk. That said, I hope I
have the support of this Commission to ask Mrs. Weiser to handle this situation without involving
any of us in the Town Commission.
I have a second. I would just like to thank the Town of Highland Beach for the opportunity that was
given to me to attend the class along with Vice Mayor Ron Brown and I look forward to the second
class that is coming up either this fall or next spring. It was very rewarding. I also would like to
thank our Town Clerk Beverly Brown for making all the arrangements. She made our trip very
pleasant. Thank you.
B) Commissioner Sheridan — Just a brief comment on Commissioner Stem's remarks. I feel that
every department head in the Town is totally responsible to our Town Manager and I see no reason
why this should even come before this Commission at this point. She has full charge of these people
and I think it should be handled on that level rather than bringing it to us. Thank you.
C) Commissioner Trinley — No Report.
D) Vice Mayor Brown - No Report.
E) Mayor Featherman — I am going to say just a few remarks if I may. First of all I would like to
congratulate our Commissioners, their views and they certainly are entitled to it and they work very
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31, 2012 Page 16 of 18
hard. There is something that did come up and just recently. I had a call from somebody who works
and lives and rents a condo and is a person that has voting rights for Highland Beach. She has lived
here for two years with her fourteen year old child. They were denied being served until she paid a
$15.00 license fee because the policy we have at the Library is rather unusual. If a person is not a
taxpayer here and isn't registered here they cannot use the Library for take outs. Now when I spoke
to the head Librarian she said that is the policy they have. I would like to change that policy. If
somebody lives in our community, whether they rent or not and they have lived here several years,
they vote here and they work here. That woman it so happens was a substitute teacher and works at
The Holiday Inn. I think that for anybody, whether they are an owner or a renter for more than one
year, should have a policy made here that we give them permission to use the Library. I would like
that opened for discussion and see what you say on that.
Commissioner Stern — I think what you are saying is a wonderful thing and I would like to see us put
this on the agenda for the meeting next week.
Mayor Featherman — Thank you very much. Is there anything else anybody would like to say on
that?
Commissioner Trinley — Yes, put it on the next agenda so we can vote on it.
9. REPORTS — TOWN ATTORNEY GLEN TORCIVIA:
I think I said enough on the Charter.
10. REPORTS — TOWN MANAGER KATHLEEN DAILEY WEISER:
Just one quick item. If you are all available after the meeting next Tuesday I would like to have a
shade meeting to discuss the Union negotiations with our Police. They just had one reopener in
their contract and we have met with them and would like to go over their request with you. So if
you are available I would like to meet with you after the Commission meeting next Tuesday
11. CONSENT AGENDA
None.
12. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND REQUESTS RELATED TO ITEMS DISCUSSED AT
MEETING
Carl Feldman, 3210 So. Ocean Blvd. — Funding limitations: If you remember a little history of
funding limitations, the people should have a right. Now the last time this came up was when we
wanted a new fire engine. We had funding limitations, the people voted against the fire engine for
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31 2012 Page 17 of 18
whatever reason they didn't want it. I think the people in this Town have a right to have a say in the
spending of things that we purchase or the things that we do. True, this funding limitation if went up
to ten percent that's a lot. If it went up to five percent, that's a lot. That's not the point. The point is
the people should have a say when we spend a lot of money for an item which they have done in the
past. Now you want to change it. You want to raise it. They'll have no say whatsoever and I think
the people in this Town should have the right to say what they want to spend their money for large
proj ects.
Gloria Tanenbaum — Seagate
With regards to the Charter Review and how thrilled you are with it and for increasing the rate to ten
percent for expenditures, the Vice Mayor keeps reiterating over and over we are talking about ten
years from now. Does this mean that this will not affect us for at least ten years? If not you are
absolutely incorrect in saying that this has nothing to do with the horrible ongoing problem we have in
this country financially at this time as the Mayor is concerned about and rightfully so.
Arlin Voress, 4403 Intracoastal Drive —
I wish to tell you that I was head of a prior Charter Review Board before so I will tell you that there is
one person sitting on your Commission right now that was on the Charter Review Board and another
one who was an elected official that is no longer here, Miriam Zwick. If you look at the amount of
money that should be in there which is the $350,000, we had the same kinds of discussions you are
having today. In my opinion you should not limit what the Commission believes should be spent and I
think to have a low number is not right. We should have a higher number and if you don't like it you
should appear at these meetings and tell the Commission what you think. I don't think you should use
the Charter Review to say okay it shouldn't be $350,000. I would make it much higher $750,000 as
you want a number. But I think you want to speak to your Commission and the people of this Town
should speak to the Commission and say what they want to do. I don't think that relying on a number
in the Charter Review Board is the right place to argue all of these things. That's all I would like to
say.
Anita Pearlman — 2352 S. Ocean Blvd.
I just want to speak as someone who will probably be here in ten years and paying taxes in ten years
and I would like to thank the Commission and everybody who has worked so hard on this Charter
because I remember when they gave out the little survey for what do you want in the new Town
Charter. My only comment is I moved here fifteen years ago because Highland Beach is unique. We
have a community that is very involved with their government. We have a community that cares so
much and we have a community of really smart people, really accomplished retirees, so much more
talent than most communities. There is actually nothing wrong in our Charter, nothing wrong than
being different from Boca. There is nothing wrong with having the ability to have a referendum.
That's precious, that's a precious gift. We don't want to give the power of the purse to four
individuals, we just don't. But, we do trust our leaders and as we go forward with the Charter I would
just encourage everyone to keep it open and keep us unique. Keep in that Charter the ability for us to
govern ourselves and not have to like so many communities across our country are hiring managers to
take over their whole town. You know that is happening, I know that's happening. Highland Beach
needs to stay Highland Beach or else let's just incorporate with Delray. That's all I have to say and
thank you again.
Town Commission Workshop Minutes
July 31 2012 Page 18 of 18
Mayor Featherman - You really have taken my words in mind because that's true. We want the
people to have a part of this town. We have the brightest people, the smartest people and people that
care. I care and I work very hard because it is not work to me. I love it and am doing it because I
don't work when I put in ten to twelve hours a day. Thank you again for coming.
13. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Commission, Mayor Featherman adjourned the
Workshop Meeting at 3:05 PM upon a MOTION by Commissioner Sheridan and seconded by
Commissioner Stern.
APPROVED:
A
Bernard Featherman, Mayor
A
Ron rown, Vice Mayo
Dennis J. Shen-ddn, Co issioner
is Stern, t`6`rvdhi4sioner
TTEST:
B verly M. rown, MMC
to