Loading...
1986.02.11_FAB_Minutes_Regular.. ti _ TOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH, FLORIDA FINANCIAL ADVISORY BOARD February 11, 1986 10:00 A.M. A meeting of the Financial Advisory Board was held at Town Hall on Tuesday, February 11, 1986 at 10:00 a.m. Those attending included members Richard Brunton, Ben Cohen. Walter Peklenk, and Reese James. Town Commissioner Grier and Town Manager Williams were also present throughout the meeting. The Minutes of the January 27, 1986 Meeting were approved as written. The following two subjects were then taken up: -Town Organizational Chart 3 Charts were reviewed (1) The chart as adopted by the Commission dated Oct. 1, 1982; (2) The chart as it appears to function this date as reviewed by the Town Manager; (3) The chart as proposed by the Town Manager for ultimate presentation to the Commission. It is the unanimous feeling of the FAB that the present (1982) chart is in need of restructuring, that several of the positions as currently provided both in the budget and in the organizational chart should be reviewed as to need considering the decline in Town Hall activity and the advent of data processing. The FAB concluded its discussion on this subject by requesting the Town Manager to give further thought to his proposed chart and preparing a revision with new data as requested in the discussion. - Trash/sewage charges This matter received an extensive discussion with particular concern on the effect to property owners should the town move from a fee -for -service policy to a tax -based recovery of the expenses for these services. Bearing in mind the enclosed data as it pertains to this subject, the FAB unanimously recommends that the Town Commission consider changing from the present fee -for -service policy to a policy of incorporating the expenses for these services in the general tax structure effective with the 1986/87 tax year. Financial Advisory Board February 11, 1986 Page 2 of 2 At this point, the meeting had to adjourn at 12:00 noon because of other commitments of it's members. Resp ctfully submitted, 7� w _ 1 Reese E. James, Chairman copies: Members, FAB Town Commissioners Town Manager Enclosures December 5, 1985 MEMO TO: Financial Advisory Board Members FROM: Reese James, Chairman SUBJECT: Trash and Sewage Charges Over the past year several requests have been posed to the Commissioners regarding the Town's present policy at charging property owners for trash and sewage service on a fee for service basis. While the Commissioners have not specifically asked the F.A.B. to review this policy, it has been suggested that it would be appropriate for us to do so and, as you will recall, this item was included on our projects list for this year, copy of which was furnished to the Commission members. In reviewing this subject, I find that in the years past, the ex- penses for these items were included in the general tax struc- ture. The question for us is whether the F.A.B. should recommend to the Commission that the Town, as a matter of policy, should return to the practice of including trash collection and sewage disposal in our annual general budget and thus to the individual property owners tax rate. In considering this matter, I am unable to deterimine any signifi- cant disadvantage to the Town and to the contrary, believe there are some benefits to be gained if such a change were made. Using data from the fiscal year just ended on 9/30/85, the fol- lowing reflects the financial aspects of these items: Sewage, Revenue $500,508 Expenses 619,477 Incl. $60,000 Adm charge Gain (Loss)$(118,969) Sanitation/ Refuse Revenue $190,753 (Trash) Expenses 166,906 Incl. $5,000 Adm charge Gain (Loss) $ 23,847 Financial Advisory Board December 5, 1985 Page 2 Obviously, the Town could not go into debt for the loss in oper- ating the sewage system, therefore, the $118,969 loss has been made up out of the general fund (taxation). As mentioned earlier, I find no disadvantage to the Tbwn. Again, obviously, the Town must recover its expenses either through taxes or fees. I do find two advantages for the Town, though: 1. In collecting the taxes early in the fiscal year, the monies are put into interest bearing accounts until needed and thus, the Town will gain the interest earnings on some $700,000; 2. by using the tax source for payment, the Town would eliminate the clerical and mailing expense of the billings now associated with the tax system. There is an advantage to the property owner --payments for the fee system are not tax-deductible, whereas, payment through the tax system is a Federal and where applicable, a State tax tax deduc- tion. At the present both sewage and trash are collected from the Condominium Associations which, in turn, collect from the property owners thru their operating assessment. This assessment is not tax deductible. Again, payment through the tax assessment would be tax deductible. If we were to assume that the average property owner in this Town is in the 30% Federal tax bracket, and using the earlier mentioned $700,000 as the combined expenses of these items, then the net savings to the property owners in total would be some $210,000 a year. Figures as of 8/31/85 indicate that the Town has some 3200 residences, this would calculate out to some $65 per residence in savings. Not huge, but I believe the 30% for an average tax bracket to be conservative, and at any rate, the savings can be made without a cost to the Town. I would appreciate your review of the above in preparation for our December 18th meeting at which time this item will be on our agenda. Reese James, Chairman Financial Advisory Board RJ/bms cc: Mayor Sullivan, Commissioner Grier, Town Manager