Loading...
1993.06.09_PB_Minutes_RegularC TOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC HEARING/REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, June 9, 1993 9.30 A.M. Chairman Robert L. Lowe called the Public Hearing/Regular Meeting to order in Commission Chambers at 9:30 A.M. Deputy Town Clerk Doris Trinley called the roll. Present were the Chairman and Members Leonard D. Bell, Frank L. Colarullo, James F. Morrill and William Maltz. Vice Chairman Arthur R. Keller was absent. [Member Paul R. Kane, Sr. resigned from the Board effective May 26, 1993.] Also present were Building Official Lee Leffingwell, Town Attorney Thomas E. Sliney and members of the general public. Upon MOTION by MR. MORRILL/MR. COLARULLO the Minutes of the May 12, 1993 Regular Meeting were unanimously approved. PUBLIC HEARING: Review Plans, Receive Public Comments and Make Recom- mendation re an Existing Freestanding Mooring at 1116 Highland Beach Drive, Block 2, Lot 10, Bel Lido. Submitted by Dr. Albert Biehl Owner). As per Town Code, Dr. Biehl presented receipts of certified mailings advising of today's Public Hearing, which he had sent to property owners within 1000 feet of his property, where the mooring was installed. He explained he had installed flotation pontoons for his boat without pulling a permit because it was his interpretation that Town Code did not specifically state this type of device needed to be permitted. He also said that the main objection from some of his neighbors, which ultimately led to today's hearing, was the canopy now in place on the device, not the device itself. In this regard, Dr. Biehl admitted that the canopy was still in place at this time because if he were denied a permit at this Hearing, it would be easier and less costly [he alleged the canopy and superstructure alone were worth about $5,000] to sell the entire set-up as is; if he were granted the permit today, he would gladly remove the canopy and its superstructure to accommodate his neighbors' wishes. Regarding permitting from other governmental agencies, he said the State had exempted the device and the County had already inspected it, indicating no expected problem. . As a point of information, Dr. Biehl said his current boat measures 32' long and is 14' high from the water line. . Planning Board Public Hearing/Regular Meeting June 9, 1993 Page 2 of 4 Building Official Leffingwell said she would have no objection to issuing a permit for the pontoons should the Board so decide, but re- quested their directive include permanent removal of the canopy and its superstructure. She also advised that the Town would issue no permit until all other pertinent governmental agency permits were on file; in this regard she noted that Dr. Biehl would also have to check with the Army Corps of Engineers to determine if a permit was required from them. Public comments were made by three of Dr. Biehl's nearby neighbors. Richard Mendelson, Silvio Blaskovic and Henry Morris all stated that permanent removal of the canopy and its superstructure would satisfy the aesthetics of the area and greatly improve the "view;" none had objection to Dr. Biehl's being granted a permit for the pontoons. Besides these, there were no other public comments. Substantial discussion took place, including imposing a time certain for the removal of the canopy and its superstructure, which met with agreement from Dr. Biehl's neighbors. In conclusion and upon advice from Town Attorney Sliney, MR. MALTZ/MR. COLARULLO made by the fol- lowing MOTION: . THE PLANNING BOARD MOVES THAT THE REQUESTED PERMIT BE ISSUED ON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) THE CANOPY AND SUPERSTRUCTURE BE PERMANENTLY REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS DATE [JUNE 9, 1993] AND (2) ALL APPLICABLE GOVERN - PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPLIED FOR AND GRANTED. Roll call met with unanimous favorable vote. REGULAR MEETING: Amended Site Plan Review for Conversion of 10 Units o a TrT_pT_ex___a_t 3535 S. Ocean Blvd., Lot 78E. Submitted by Donald E. Bryan, Architect for Antonacci (Owner). Mr. Bryan addressed the Board, giving a background' of the project, which included his taking over from the original architect, and explaining some of the changes made. He advised that although the changes were extensive, the "envelope" or "footprint" of the existing structure being renovated was not altered. Lengthy discussion took place, during which Ms. Leffingwell advised that one of her concerns had been identifying exactly where the parking spaces would be located. She said the original renovation called for 8 spaces, but now had been reduced to 6, located in a "parking court" utilizing brick pavers which she would not require being lined or striped. However, because these would be considered 3 individual townhouses, which in effect could be sold separately in the future, she had required that one of the spaces be designated and sized for handicapped use per current law. She also said that "as built" drawings would be required due to the multiple changes. Planning Board Public Hearing/Regular Meeting • June 9, 1993 Page 3 of 4 The members then convened to the table to review plans; questions were were answered to their satisfaction. Concluding discussion and review, MR. MALTZ/MR. MORRILL made the fol- lowing MOTION: THE PLANNING BOARD APPROVES AMENDED SITE PLAN FOR CONVERSION OF 10 UNITS TO A TRIPLEX AT 3525 S. OCEAN BLVD., LOT 78 EAST. SUBMITTED BY DONALD E. BRYAN, ARCHITECT FOR ANTONACCI (OWNER); BRYAN & ASSOCIATES, COMMISSION NO. 92-052, DATED 5/26/93, SHEETS SP1, Al THRU A4, E1 THRU E5, P1 THRU P3, M1 THRU M2. Roll call met with unanimous favorable vote. OTHER Attorney Sliney advised that nothing has been received in writing from Robert Eisen regarding his address to the Town Commission at their May Workshop meeting concerning a release of Unity of Title on lots 129E (North and South). It was noted that should Mr. Eisen and his associates want to proceed, they would first have to go before the Planning Board who, in turn, would make a recommendation to the Town Commission. Noting Paul Kane's resignation due to personal reasons that necessi- tated his missing three consecutive meetings, Chairman Lowe said he had asked that the Town Commission consider reappointing Mr. Kane on his return. This led to a discussion of the "3 -absences and you're out" rule as set forth in Section 20.26 of Town Code. It was the con- sensus of the members that the rule should be amended to allow the Chairman discretion to excuse absences based on individual circum- stances. For the record, it was also noted that as of today, there has been nothing in writing submitted to the Building Department regarding a Special Exception Meeting regarding Aldo Ruscito's request for a boat lifting device to be installed at his residence (4229 Intracoastal Dr . ) as per Town Code Chapter 30, Sec. 5.2(d)(2) and Sec. 10. It was also noted the Building Department had been in touch with Mr. Ruscito's representative for the project, Howard Montgomery of BK Marine, and was advised by Mr. Montgomery that they are awaiting drawings. There being no further business to come before the Board at this time, the meeting was adjourned upon MOTION by MR. MALTZ/MR. BELL at 11:00 A.M. • dmt WOXJ SlINUaa HlgVDIgaaV azV (z) aNH (6 aNnr) RIVG szxz 3o saeQ OC m o o- a o rn c. w• o n .o zr Q- 5D M n a4 aQ m �. (D aQ (D C C CACD co — c A -1(D R t1 G cn C. C �y� A ty0 a' A -n (D y OR G G w O O = L, ' cn p Sn to aCC t1 n �. A o (D'� D oo (ooo ooa Rmq�, . CD o :(D �- 4 q:4 cn vo ocD (D o o ti 0 0 - cO+ G m n o v ti w b cD aq ca w� O G G 7r b r* r" o. 0, a,(D O k n m eO+ o n CD .G (D w O � �p m ' C ' CD D (D (D e+ (D 'b G a c+ .y• 1 • «i (D O CP A O A C (�D C' C. (D . QO7 En a+ O' �* O a (D O n 7r A ►t m m n �! G ti p ... ... G CD CD Wi cn O CD w G CD o ccm p- CD w b m v, C ry'O N o o CD a C � 7rts, p'U �ar'0 ep+� o•o c'm CL m C aR 0 o ti o o a. o w C b (D `< w o ,� . j G CD ra Qq r t (D .�' o c+ w O C. n b CD ci (D m G. aCeOr p ►� y rA camti (D twn m �' w p + - A n G ? e�•r N o (D �... Q' m �_ o w G o m c'�• o�yy ca O < G GCY CD CD, a cti O w O CD o (D C n (RD ca o a M o n r+ O z �• (p C o o (D a F"'. A em•► y ""y er o (D a co r (�D m ai t3. n °" �' w O '�.-2 (n p G w b G CD mOCR R O. 7 (D°C� �c�� m o O CDs "'ot �.Q 7cC (D ca cn cu uG (D m y w' cn •0 (D C r , W z O}' Cn CD A o o^ o O (D G H 0 o r' CAD o O! `� 'o v b 0 o 5 �' 0 .7 m O (D n n n w -s C G 'L3 b . on CD ,° �'' ` '� O C m w 0 (OD O ~ (D `O R. C C ~ �' Cr' O (OD UQ o R. (mD y �' '�' << (D Sn p .y ... c+ cc ..., p,�,,,' n• (D O (D (D n CA `C (D G r° w o• �~�+. A a m O cc -O a•'C G �' n .y G cl, � �.... CO Cr D� •`w3• eC' e•r �,,,. (D n O (D m �a er o GCD CO O O O �G... (D �• �' w OR G O CO �. G eO•r O (D F. 'p w o �'• G ..t r. ems+ (D A O• epi• O ar ..t e� aw , CD < e•r .y e- e+ cn �, OR e+ .'7 d n �-s 'ri •-•, p, cD cD cl) CD w y v o o m .. o w er M C a- p w C aq ai G 00 ►-, QGQ o `< G y CO � a (D m C ^C aq y o m' (9 0 'ti C� ts. `C CDD a m w o u' ^�+ C"- !D m (DCD � mo o+ G• �' b y _ = � cr ? o � g 'b c b cD �, D `O m a�R c 5. ; ID w CV CD m CO .0. oy cDj s C..s �. w o• cn B cn G ewr o y �' cor 'C7 << e+ p C OR CD ear G O cD D o 00 .�. ... ? "DD (D n o O CO Cn9 C.. aR ti o OR cC" O rR.. CSD e~r �'. a C. `� .d C/1 �•-; O- O m cy 'J" =- G O o nCD G m m COD Gr CSD to f�D• m � O -t (D K .0 fD .0.: m .y CD w (�D e+• �. (�D tD D .d a - Z (�D p� m =' y„, w m �% �"'% c. �J' • r. f)' G ": n e* M cCD D CD G r x„07 QR l b O ^� (D co eD Qq O e+ ID �' O n .^Y m aq' 'J' e+ .-. OcR n►.. CD 7 .o ca w v, aq o w 0 o o w av d o <v 'd c y ::ry CD N v :; 0 0 b < w 0 D G G aCD �. O (D m o" C •- O n `� p O .. r�r a� O ►O! R ��. co (D~ G =. o� CO a O G ^+ O o S. G G o o QQ C"o-� CD eOr O �t G �• c c -r cr "'' acCAn CD ft�D� CD C O `.s a. g Uq " .� m ►.i C71 Gp O ,_., w (D 0..� n c+ .'' (D O• O C' W p �f ^t cn CY m eD <D 7 o o 's G (�D v� `� �. ^� G O D w (D (D Ra a Ej 1 CD �: m �<r• • G r a cS w ' c n Z5 , � G aq `C : ai co ti G O (D O C 3 n O o r^ w C r. a' Q' oo =� o C' (D fD Z O n (D (D < = cn 0 �• c+ �.• a �t c< c+ •-y w oR = << `< a `< << `< . (D w X., (D -s a O a 7r a •y (D cn �. 'I W. cm Planning Board Public Hearing/Regular Meeting • June 9, 1993 Page 4 of 4 ATTEST DATE: